IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.44 of 2026 ====================================================== Virendra Shukla Son of Late Ram Vilash Shukla, Resident of Village-Ghordiha, P.S.-Kargahar, District-Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through District Magistrate cum Collector, Rohtas at Sasaram. 2. The District Magistrate cum Collector, Rohtas at Sasaram. 3. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Sasaram, District-Rohtas. 4. The Circle Officer, Kargahar, District-Rohtas. 5. Subhag Ram, Son of Late Mohar Ram, Resident of Village-Ghordiha, P.S.-Kargahar, District-Rohtas. 6. Virendra Ram, Son of Late Mohar Ram, Resident of Village-Ghordiha, P.S.-Kargahar, District-Rohtas. 7. Satyendra Ram, Son of Late Mohar Ram, Resident of Village-Ghordiha, P.S.-Kargahar, District-Rohtas. 8. Parikha Ram, Son of Late Basudev Ram, Resident of Village-Ghordiha, P.S.-Kargahar, District-Rohtas. 9. Jawahar Ram, Son of Late Ghurfekan Ram, Resident of Village-Ghordiha, P.S.-Kargahar, District-Rohtas. 10. Ajay Ram, Son of Late Binod Ram, Resident of Village-Ghordiha, P.S.-Kargahar, District-Rohtas. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rajesh Kumar Mishra, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Standing Counsel (9) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR ORAL ORDER

2 25-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the Respondent-State. 2. The instant writ application has been filed for the following relief(s):- “(i) 1. That this application is being filed for issuance of an appropriate writ(s), rule(s), order(s), direction(s), commanding upon the respondents to show cause as to why the encroachment has not been removed from the public land situated Patna High Court CWJC No.44 of 2026(2) dt.25-06-2026 2/2 in front of the Raiyati land of the petitioner i.e. Khata No. 70, Khesara No. 448 village-Ghordiha, Circle Kargahar, District- Rohtas And/Or Pass such any other order/orders which may found fit in the facts and circumstances of the case.” 3. In light of Annexure P/2 and P/3, the Circle Officer, Kargahar, Rohtas will initiate the appropriate proceeding under Section 3 of the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act, 1956 and, after giving notice to all concerned, necessary orders shall be passed, adjudicating the issues, in question, and once it is found that the land, in question, is a public land and the same has been encroached by the private persons, the same shall be made encroachment free within the three months from initiation of proceeding under Section 3 of the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act, 1956 4. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. (Ajit Kumar, J) perwez U

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.44 of 2026 ====================================================== Virendra Shukla Son of Late Ram Vilash Shukla, Resident of Village-Ghordiha, P.S.-Kargahar, District-Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through District Magistrate cum Collector, Rohtas at Sasaram. 2. The District Magistrate cum Collector, Rohtas at Sasaram. 3. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Sasaram, District-Rohtas. 4. The Circle Officer, Kargahar, District-Rohtas. 5. Subhag Ram, Son of Late Mohar Ram, Resident of Village-Ghordiha, P.S.-Kargahar, District-Rohtas. 6. Virendra Ram, Son of Late Mohar Ram, Resident of Village-Ghordiha, P.S.-Kargahar, District-Rohtas. 7. Satyendra Ram, Son of Late Mohar Ram, Resident of Village-Ghordiha, P.S.-Kargahar, District-Rohtas. 8. Parikha Ram, Son of Late Basudev Ram, Resident of Village-Ghordiha, P.S.-Kargahar, District-Rohtas. 9. Jawahar Ram, Son of Late Ghurfekan Ram, Resident of Village-Ghordiha, P.S.-Kargahar, District-Rohtas. 10. Ajay Ram, Son of Late Binod Ram, Resident of Village-Ghordiha, P.S.-Kargahar, District-Rohtas. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rajesh Kumar Mishra, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Standing Counsel (9) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR ORAL ORDER

2 25-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the Respondent-State. 2. The instant writ application has been filed for the following relief(s):- “(i) 1. That this application is being filed for issuance of an appropriate writ(s), rule(s), order(s), direction(s), commanding upon the respondents to show cause as to why the encroachment has not been removed from the public land situated Patna High Court CWJC No.44 of 2026(2) dt.25-06-2026 2/2 in front of the Raiyati land of the petitioner i.e. Khata No. 70, Khesara No. 448 village-Ghordiha, Circle Kargahar, District- Rohtas And/Or Pass such any other order/orders which may found fit in the facts and circumstances of the case.” 3. In light of Annexure P/2 and P/3, the Circle Officer, Kargahar, Rohtas will initiate the appropriate proceeding under Section 3 of the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act, 1956 and, after giving notice to all concerned, necessary orders shall be passed, adjudicating the issues, in question, and once it is found that the land, in question, is a public land and the same has been encroached by the private persons, the same shall be made encroachment free within the three months from initiation of proceeding under Section 3 of the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act, 1956 4. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. (Ajit Kumar, J) perwez U