IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39376 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-147 Year-2026 Thana- KALYANPUR District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1. Ravindra Sah Son of Shiv Shankar Sah @ Shivshankar Sah Resident of Village- Shambhuchak, P.S.- Kalyanpur, District- East Champaran (Bihar). 2. Savindra Sah Son of Shiv Shankar Sah @ Shivshankar Sah Resident of Village- Shambhuchak, P.S.- Kalyanpur, District- East Champaran (Bihar). ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dr.Mrityunjaya Kr. Gautam, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 23-06-2026 Heard Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Dr. Mrityunjaya Kr. Gautam, learned APP for the State. 2. Petitioners seek bail, who are in custody since 02.04.2026, in connection with Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 147 of 2026, F.I.R. dated 02.04.2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 118(1), 115(2), 109(1), 76, 303(2), 351(2), 352, 3(5) of the B.N.S. 3. Allegation against the petitioners is that they along with other co-accused persons have assaulted the informant and his family members due to which they sustained injuries.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39376 of 2026(2) dt.23-06-2026 2/3 the present case. He further submits that the present case is counter blast of Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 146 of 2026 filed on behalf of the petitioner against the informant and his family members and both the parties are agnates to each other. Further submits that it appears from the F.I.R. that due to land dispute the present occurrence had taken place. Although there is specific allegation against the petitioners that they have assaulted the informant and his family members and they have received injuries and the injury report of the injured persons suggests that the injuries are simple in nature caused by hard and blunt substance. The petitioners are in custody since 02.04.2026. 5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioners and submits that the petitioner no. 1 carries four more cases other than the present one and petitioner no. 2 carries three more cases other than the present one in which they are on bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-12, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 147 of 2026, subject to the following conditions :-Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39376 of 2026(2) dt.23-06-2026 3/3 (1) Petitioners shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on their absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bonds shall be cancelled by the Court below. (2) If the petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witness, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (3) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioners and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioners have concealed their criminal antecedents, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioners. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification. (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Ibrar//- U T

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39376 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-147 Year-2026 Thana- KALYANPUR District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1. Ravindra Sah Son of Shiv Shankar Sah @ Shivshankar Sah Resident of Village- Shambhuchak, P.S.- Kalyanpur, District- East Champaran (Bihar). 2. Savindra Sah Son of Shiv Shankar Sah @ Shivshankar Sah Resident of Village- Shambhuchak, P.S.- Kalyanpur, District- East Champaran (Bihar). ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dr.Mrityunjaya Kr. Gautam, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 23-06-2026 Heard Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Dr. Mrityunjaya Kr. Gautam, learned APP for the State. 2. Petitioners seek bail, who are in custody since 02.04.2026, in connection with Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 147 of 2026, F.I.R. dated 02.04.2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 118(1), 115(2), 109(1), 76, 303(2), 351(2), 352, 3(5) of the B.N.S. 3. Allegation against the petitioners is that they along with other co-accused persons have assaulted the informant and his family members due to which they sustained injuries.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39376 of 2026(2) dt.23-06-2026 2/3 the present case. He further submits that the present case is counter blast of Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 146 of 2026 filed on behalf of the petitioner against the informant and his family members and both the parties are agnates to each other. Further submits that it appears from the F.I.R. that due to land dispute the present occurrence had taken place. Although there is specific allegation against the petitioners that they have assaulted the informant and his family members and they have received injuries and the injury report of the injured persons suggests that the injuries are simple in nature caused by hard and blunt substance. The petitioners are in custody since 02.04.2026. 5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioners and submits that the petitioner no. 1 carries four more cases other than the present one and petitioner no. 2 carries three more cases other than the present one in which they are on bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-12, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 147 of 2026, subject to the following conditions :-Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39376 of 2026(2) dt.23-06-2026 3/3 (1) Petitioners shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on their absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bonds shall be cancelled by the Court below. (2) If the petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witness, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (3) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioners and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioners have concealed their criminal antecedents, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioners. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification. (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Ibrar//- U T