IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39552 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-44 Year-2026 Thana- Rajeshwari District- Supaul ====================================================== Md. Mujlim @ Md. Mujamil S/o Md. Jahir Resident of Village - Chakardaha, Ward no. - 15, P.S. - Narpatganj, Dist. - Araria. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ramesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Arun Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 22-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Rajeshwari P.S. Case No. 44 of 2026 registered for the offence under Section 30(a) pf the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022. 3. The recovery is of 702 liters of illicit liquor from a scorpio vehicle of which the petitioner is said to be the driver. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he is in custody since 23.03.2026. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready to donate Rs. 25,000/- in some charitable organization without accepting his guilt. He further submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39552 of 2026(2) dt.22-06-2026 2/3

6. Learned APP appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned concerned Court below in connection with Rajeshwari P.S. Case No. 44 of 2026. 8. This is also subject to the condition that the petitioner shall deposit an amount of Rs. 25,000/- in Ramakrishna Math, Bhatta Bazar, Purnia and produce the receipt of the same before the Court below. The bail bonds of the petitioner shall be accepted after verifying the genuineness of the receipt produced by the petitioner. 9. As a condition of this order, the petitioner after being released on bail is directed to mark his attendance at Narpatganj Police Station on first and third Sunday of each month. Any default in appearance at the police station will result in cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioner. 10. As the petitioner claims to have clean antecedent, the Court below, before accepting the bail bonds of Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39552 of 2026(2) dt.22-06-2026 3/3 the petitioner is directed to verify the antecedent of the petitioner. If the petitioner is found to be involved in any other case then the bail bonds of the petitioner shall not be accepted.

11. It is, however, clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. (Sandeep Kumar, J) Vikas/- U

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39552 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-44 Year-2026 Thana- Rajeshwari District- Supaul ====================================================== Md. Mujlim @ Md. Mujamil S/o Md. Jahir Resident of Village - Chakardaha, Ward no. - 15, P.S. - Narpatganj, Dist. - Araria. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ramesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Arun Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 22-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Rajeshwari P.S. Case No. 44 of 2026 registered for the offence under Section 30(a) pf the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022. 3. The recovery is of 702 liters of illicit liquor from a scorpio vehicle of which the petitioner is said to be the driver. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he is in custody since 23.03.2026. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready to donate Rs. 25,000/- in some charitable organization without accepting his guilt. He further submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39552 of 2026(2) dt.22-06-2026 2/3

6. Learned APP appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned concerned Court below in connection with Rajeshwari P.S. Case No. 44 of 2026. 8. This is also subject to the condition that the petitioner shall deposit an amount of Rs. 25,000/- in Ramakrishna Math, Bhatta Bazar, Purnia and produce the receipt of the same before the Court below. The bail bonds of the petitioner shall be accepted after verifying the genuineness of the receipt produced by the petitioner. 9. As a condition of this order, the petitioner after being released on bail is directed to mark his attendance at Narpatganj Police Station on first and third Sunday of each month. Any default in appearance at the police station will result in cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioner. 10. As the petitioner claims to have clean antecedent, the Court below, before accepting the bail bonds of Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39552 of 2026(2) dt.22-06-2026 3/3 the petitioner is directed to verify the antecedent of the petitioner. If the petitioner is found to be involved in any other case then the bail bonds of the petitioner shall not be accepted.

11. It is, however, clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. (Sandeep Kumar, J) Vikas/- U