Patna High Court
Chandan kumar v. The State of Bihar
- Decision date
- 2026-06-19
- Text availability
- Full text
- Judges
- Kumar Manish
Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗
Connected provisions and cases
No further provision or case links are recorded.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38284 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-74 Year-2026 Thana- RAJEPUR District- East Champaran ====================================================== Chandan kumar Son of Sanjay Yadav @ Sanjay Kumar Yadav Resident Of Village -Chintamanpur Ps -Mehsi District -East Champaran Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar Tiwari For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Umeshanand Pandit ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KUMAR MANISH ORAL ORDER 2 19-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. Petitioner seeks regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 303(2), 317(2), 317(4), 317(5), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 111(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. 3. As per the prosecution story, a stolen motorcycle was seized. The person who was caught stated that he had purchased the vehicle from one Vivek Kumar and the fake chassis number was punched by this petitioner and the name of the petitioner has transpired on the confessional statement of Yashwant Kumar..
4. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in custody since 31.03.2026 and he has nothing to do with the alleging occurrence. Allegation was ever levelled against the petitioner is Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38284 of 2026(2) dt.19-06-2026 2/2 false, concocted and baseless. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari/ successor Court in connection with Rajepur P.S. Case No. 74 of 2026 on the following condition :- (i) That one of the bailor should be family member of the petitioner. (ii) That the petitioner will cooperate in the trial and will remain present on all dates personally or should be duly represented through his counsel and whenever required to be physically present by the Court, he should physically appear in Court on that date. (iii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (Kumar Manish, J) sanjeev/- U T