Orissa High Court
Sadanan Pradhan @sadananda Pradhan v. The State of Odisha
WP(C)/29350/2026
- Decision date
- 2026-09-10
- Text availability
- Full text
- Judges
- S. K. Panigrahi
Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗
Connected provisions and cases
No further provision or case links are recorded.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.29350 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010704652026 Sadanan Pradhan @ …. Petitioner(s) Sadananda Pradhan Mr. Sushanta Kumar Pradhan, Adv. versus- The State of Odisha & …. Opposite Party(s) Ors. Mr. Prabhu Prasanna Behera, ASC CORAM: HON’BLE DR.JUSTICE SANJEEB K PANIGRAHI ORDER Order No. 10.09.2026 01. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement. 2. In filing the present Writ Petition, the Petitioner alleged to be an encroacher has challenged the notice of eviction dated 06.09.2025 vide Annexure-3. 3. Heard learned counsel for the Parties. 4. During course of hearing, learned counsel for the State, at the outset, submits that there is a clear statutory remedy of appeal available under the O.P.L.E Act against the impugned notice of eviction vide Annexure-3. Hence, the Petitioner should approach the Appellate Authority. Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed 5. In such view of the matter, this Court is not inclined to Signed by: AYASKANTA JENA Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa entertain the prayer made in this Writ Petition. However, Date: 10-Sep-2026 14:17:09 Page 1 of 2
considering the request of learned counsel for the Petitioner, this Court permits the Petitioner to file an appeal along with a petition for condonation of delay, if any, so also a petition for interim protection before the concerned Appellate Authority as per the provision under the O.P.L.E Act, within a period of fifteen working days hence. In such event, the Appellate Authority shall conclude the hearing after providing adequate opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned within a period of three months from the date of filing of the appeal. 6. It is further directed that till the interim application to be filed by the Petitioner is taken up, no coercive action shall be taken against the Petitioner pursuant to the impugned notice of eviction vide Annexure-3. 7. This Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. (Dr. Sanjeeb K Panigrahi) Judge Ayaskanta Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: AYASKANTA JENA Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 10-Sep-2026 14:17:09 Page 2 of 2