IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.19973 of 2026 CNR No.ODHC010468862026 Shiba Kumar Sethi …. Petitioner Mr. S.K. Nath, Advocate on behalf of Mr. P.K. Mohapatra, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha and others …. Opp. Parties Mrs. Suman Pattanayak, AGA CORAM: JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO ORDER 08.09.2026 (Hybrid Mode) Order No. 01. 1. The writ petition has been filed with the following prayers: “I) Issue Rule NISI calling upon the opposite parties to show cause as to why the impugned order dated 11.06.2026 shall not be quashed and thereby quashing the impugned order dated 11.06.2026 under Annexure-4: II) Direct the opposite parties to restore petitioner to the promotional post of Revenue Inspector with all consequential service and financial benefits; III) Pass such order (S)/direction(s) as deemed fit and proper in the Bonafide interest of justice.” 2. Memo of date is filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, which states thus: Page 1 of 2 “During pendency of the aforesaid case petitioner has got the benefits as prayed for. Hence, petitioner does not want to proceed the aforesaid case and the same may be withdrawn as not press.” (sic) Memo is taken on record. Scanned copy be updated. 3. The writ application is disposed of accordingly. (Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo) Judge Radha Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: RADHARANI JENA Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 09-Sep-2026 11:46:50 Page 2 of 2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.19973 of 2026 CNR No.ODHC010468862026 Shiba Kumar Sethi …. Petitioner Mr. S.K. Nath, Advocate on behalf of Mr. P.K. Mohapatra, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha and others …. Opp. Parties Mrs. Suman Pattanayak, AGA CORAM: JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO ORDER 08.09.2026 (Hybrid Mode) Order No. 01. 1. The writ petition has been filed with the following prayers: “I) Issue Rule NISI calling upon the opposite parties to show cause as to why the impugned order dated 11.06.2026 shall not be quashed and thereby quashing the impugned order dated 11.06.2026 under Annexure-4: II) Direct the opposite parties to restore petitioner to the promotional post of Revenue Inspector with all consequential service and financial benefits; III) Pass such order (S)/direction(s) as deemed fit and proper in the Bonafide interest of justice.” 2. Memo of date is filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, which states thus: Page 1 of 2 “During pendency of the aforesaid case petitioner has got the benefits as prayed for. Hence, petitioner does not want to proceed the aforesaid case and the same may be withdrawn as not press.” (sic) Memo is taken on record. Scanned copy be updated. 3. The writ application is disposed of accordingly. (Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo) Judge Radha Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: RADHARANI JENA Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 09-Sep-2026 11:46:50 Page 2 of 2