IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMP No.594 of 2026 (CNR No. ODHC010298972026) Dr. Prafulla Kumar Chinara …. Petitioner Mr. R.D. Nayak, Advocate -Versus- State of Odisha & others …. Opposite Parties Mr. S. Panda, ASC CORAM: MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK ORDER 02.09.2026 I.A. No.136 of 2026 Order No. 03. 1. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. 2. Instant I.A. is filed seeking amendment to the CRLMP for the reasons stated. 3. The nature of amendment is formal, hence, considering the submissions of learned counsels from both the sides, this Court is inclined to allow the I.A. 4. Accordingly, it is ordered. 5. The I.A. is disposed of with the amendment allowed. 6. Office is to carry out the above order. (R.K. Pattanaik) Judge CRLMP No.594 of 2026 04. 1. Heard. 2. Instant CRLMP is filed by the petitioner for a direction to the opposite parties, in particular, opposite party No.4 to Page 1 of 3 execute the NBWA issued by order dated 24th July, 2023 in 1.C.C. No.1012 of 2017 directed by the learned J.M.F.C.(II) (Cog.), Cuttack on the grounds stated. 3. Mr. Das Nayak, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the warrant of arrest issued by the learned court below is still not executed and pending for long, hence, the CRLMP and refers to Annexure-1 series while claiming so. The submission is that the petitioner is an elderly person and NBWA, since not yet executed, hence, a direction is necessary in that regard to opposite party No.4.

4. Mr. Panda, learned ASC for the State submits the intimation received from opposite party No.4 dated 6th May, 2026 addressed to the Office of the Advocate General, Odisha stating that the NBWA has already been executed on 27th March, 2023, but the order-sheets at Annexure-1 series do not reveal the same. According to Mr. Das Nayak, learned counsel for the petitioner, the NBWA has not been executed at all. 5. Considering the claim of the petitioner and submission of Mr. Das Nayak, learned counsel for the petitioner referring to the order-sheets of the learned court below in 1.C.C. No.1012 of 2017, it is made to understand that the execution of NBWA is awaiting compliance since the production of the accused any time on or after 23rd March, 2023 is not revealed and hence, a direction is necessary for its execution without further delay. 6. Accordingly, it is ordered. 7. In the result, CRLMP stands disposed of with the direction as aforesaid for compliance by opposite party No.4 to Page 2 of 3 ensure that the NBWA issued against the accused is executed at the earliest preferably within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 8. Issue urgent certified copy as per rules. 9. A copy of the order to the State for onward intimation to opposite party No.4 for early compliance. (R.K. Pattanaik) Judge Alok Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: ALOK RANJAN SETHY Reason: Authentication Location: ORISSA HIGH COURT

Date: 07-Sep-2026 19:11:40 Page 3 of 3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMP No.594 of 2026 (CNR No. ODHC010298972026) Dr. Prafulla Kumar Chinara …. Petitioner Mr. R.D. Nayak, Advocate -Versus- State of Odisha & others …. Opposite Parties Mr. S. Panda, ASC CORAM: MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK ORDER 02.09.2026 I.A. No.136 of 2026 Order No. 03. 1. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. 2. Instant I.A. is filed seeking amendment to the CRLMP for the reasons stated. 3. The nature of amendment is formal, hence, considering the submissions of learned counsels from both the sides, this Court is inclined to allow the I.A. 4. Accordingly, it is ordered. 5. The I.A. is disposed of with the amendment allowed. 6. Office is to carry out the above order. (R.K. Pattanaik) Judge CRLMP No.594 of 2026 04. 1. Heard. 2. Instant CRLMP is filed by the petitioner for a direction to the opposite parties, in particular, opposite party No.4 to Page 1 of 3 execute the NBWA issued by order dated 24th July, 2023 in 1.C.C. No.1012 of 2017 directed by the learned J.M.F.C.(II) (Cog.), Cuttack on the grounds stated. 3. Mr. Das Nayak, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the warrant of arrest issued by the learned court below is still not executed and pending for long, hence, the CRLMP and refers to Annexure-1 series while claiming so. The submission is that the petitioner is an elderly person and NBWA, since not yet executed, hence, a direction is necessary in that regard to opposite party No.4.

4. Mr. Panda, learned ASC for the State submits the intimation received from opposite party No.4 dated 6th May, 2026 addressed to the Office of the Advocate General, Odisha stating that the NBWA has already been executed on 27th March, 2023, but the order-sheets at Annexure-1 series do not reveal the same. According to Mr. Das Nayak, learned counsel for the petitioner, the NBWA has not been executed at all. 5. Considering the claim of the petitioner and submission of Mr. Das Nayak, learned counsel for the petitioner referring to the order-sheets of the learned court below in 1.C.C. No.1012 of 2017, it is made to understand that the execution of NBWA is awaiting compliance since the production of the accused any time on or after 23rd March, 2023 is not revealed and hence, a direction is necessary for its execution without further delay. 6. Accordingly, it is ordered. 7. In the result, CRLMP stands disposed of with the direction as aforesaid for compliance by opposite party No.4 to Page 2 of 3 ensure that the NBWA issued against the accused is executed at the earliest preferably within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 8. Issue urgent certified copy as per rules. 9. A copy of the order to the State for onward intimation to opposite party No.4 for early compliance. (R.K. Pattanaik) Judge Alok Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: ALOK RANJAN SETHY Reason: Authentication Location: ORISSA HIGH COURT

Date: 07-Sep-2026 19:11:40 Page 3 of 3