Orissa High Court
Kamrun Nesa v. State of Odisha
CRLMP/1239/2026
- Decision date
- 2026-09-01
- Text availability
- Full text
- Judges
- R. K. Pattanaik
Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗
Connected provisions and cases
No further provision or case links are recorded.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMP No.1239 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010613942026 Kamrun Nesa …. Petitioner Mr. P.S. Das, Advocate -Versus- State of Odisha & others …. Opposite Parties Mr. B.P. Nayak, AGA CORAM: MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK ORDER Order 01.09.2026 No. 01. 1. Heard Mr. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Nayak, learned AGA for the State. 2. Instant CRLMP is filed by the petitioner for a direction to the opposite parties and particularly, opposite party No.3 to register the FIR on the complaint i.e. Annexure-1 and to take appropriate legal action against the accused persons in accordance with law and also to provide her police protection for the reasons stated. 3. Mr. Das, learned counsel submits that in spite of the complaint as per Annexure-1 and that the accused persons have committed cognizable offences, no FIR is registered. It is submitted to the Court that the written complaint has not been entertained by the local police, hence, the CRLMP. 4. State’s response is recorded, which is to the effect that the petitioner has not sent a copy of the complaint to opposite party No.2, for action when the FIR was not received. Page 1 of 2
5. Since the claim is about the accused persons committed cognizable offences details of which stand narrated in the complaint at Annexure-1, this Court is of the view that a direction is necessary to opposite party No.3 to look into the allegations therein and in case any such cognizable offences alleged to have been committed by anyone named, to register the complaint as FIR and to proceed thereafter as per law. 6. Accordingly, it is ordered. 7. In the result, the CRLMP stands disposed of with the direction as aforesaid for compliance by opposite party No.3. 8. Issue urgent certified copy of this order as per rules. 9. A copy of the order to the State for intimation to opposite party No. 3 for early compliance. (R.K. Pattanaik) Judge Tudu Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: THAKURDAS TUDU Reason: Authentication Location: OHC,CTC Date: 07-Sep-2026 17:46:05 Page 2 of 2