Orissa High Court
Mamini Panda v. Birendra Kumar Korkora, Director, Secondary Education, Odisha
CONTC/5619/2026
- Decision date
- 2026-08-28
- Text availability
- Full text
- Judges
- Aditya Kumar Mohapatra
Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗
Connected provisions and cases
No further provision or case links are recorded.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CONTC No.5619 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010638752026 Mamini Panda ..... Petitioner Represented by Adv. – Mr. Santosh Kumar Mohanty, Gr Rout -versus- Birendra Kumar Korkora, ..... Opposite Party/ Director, Secondary Education, Contemnor Odisha, Bhubaneswar. Represented by Adv. – Mr. U.R. Jena, AGA CORAM: MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA ORDER 28.08.2026 Order No. 01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid mode. 2. It is alleged by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that the order dated 22.05.2026 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No.16234 of 2026 having been duly communicated to the Opposite Party-Contemnor vide postal receipt under Annexure-3 to the contempt application, however, the Opposite Party-Contemnor has not implemented the same. In such view of the matter, learned counsel for the Petitioner alleged wilful and deliberate violation of this Court’s order which makes the Opposite Party-Contemnor liable to be proceeded under the Contempt of Court’s Act, 3. Learned counsel for the Opposite Party-Contemnor, on the Page 1 of 1. other hand, sought for some time to implement the order of this Court in the event the same attains finality.
4. Taking into consideration the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing for the respective parties, this Court grants further four weeks’ time, as a last chance, to the Opposite Party-Contemnor to implement the order dated 22.05.2026 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No.16234 of 2026, failing which, the Opposite Party-Contemnor shall be asked to appear in person before this Court and to explain as to why a proceeding under the Contempt of Courts Act shall not be initiated against him for wilful and deliberate violation of this Court’s order. 5. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the contempt petition is disposed of with liberty to the Petitioner to revive the contempt application in the event the order passed by this Court is not implemented. (Aditya Kumar Mohapatra) Judge Debasis Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: DEBASIS AECH Designation: SECRETARY Reason: Authentication Location: ORISSA HIGH COURT Date: 01-Sep-2026 21:06:27 Page 2 of 2.