IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CMP No.1636 of 2016 [CNR No.- ODHC010293612016] Narayan Prasad Das …. Petitioner None -versus- 1. Mukti Sahu 2. Nanigopal Sahu 3. Rabindra Sahu 4. Debendra Sahu 5. Surendra Sahu …. Opp. Parties None CORAM: HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO ORDER Order No. 20.08.2026 03. (Through hybrid Mode) 1. This matter is taken up from the weekly list. 2. This CMP has been filed challenging the order dated 15.09.2016 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Jaleswar in I.A. No.28/2016-I, arising out of R.F.A. No.30/2011 (Annexure-6) rejecting the application filed by the Opposite Parties. 3. Interim order has not been passed in this case. 4. None appears on behalf of the Petitioner or the Opposite Parties / Caveator when the matter is called. Page 1 of 2 5. Since interim order had not been passed in this case, it can be presumed that in the meanwhile RFA No.30 of 2011 has been disposed of. 6. Hence, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the CMP pending, which is accordingly dismissed. 7. Misc. Case No.1727 of 2016 stands disposed of. (Savitri Ratho) Judge Madhusmita Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: MADHUSMITA PARIDA Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 20-Aug-2026 19:37:41 Page 2 of 2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CMP No.1636 of 2016 [CNR No.- ODHC010293612016] Narayan Prasad Das …. Petitioner None -versus- 1. Mukti Sahu 2. Nanigopal Sahu 3. Rabindra Sahu 4. Debendra Sahu 5. Surendra Sahu …. Opp. Parties None CORAM: HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO ORDER Order No. 20.08.2026 03. (Through hybrid Mode) 1. This matter is taken up from the weekly list. 2. This CMP has been filed challenging the order dated 15.09.2016 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Jaleswar in I.A. No.28/2016-I, arising out of R.F.A. No.30/2011 (Annexure-6) rejecting the application filed by the Opposite Parties. 3. Interim order has not been passed in this case. 4. None appears on behalf of the Petitioner or the Opposite Parties / Caveator when the matter is called. Page 1 of 2 5. Since interim order had not been passed in this case, it can be presumed that in the meanwhile RFA No.30 of 2011 has been disposed of. 6. Hence, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the CMP pending, which is accordingly dismissed. 7. Misc. Case No.1727 of 2016 stands disposed of. (Savitri Ratho) Judge Madhusmita Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: MADHUSMITA PARIDA Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 20-Aug-2026 19:37:41 Page 2 of 2