IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C). No. 25230 of 2026 ODHC010595932026 Singada Weekly `…. Petitioner Market, Mayurbhanj Represented by Mr. K.K.Nayak, Advocate -Versus - State of Odisha and …. Opposite Parties Ors Represented by Mr. S.N.Pattnaik, AGA CORAM: JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA ORDER_ 12.08.2026Order No. 01. 1. This matter is taken up through virtual mode. 2. The petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayer: “It is, therefore prayed that, the Hon’ble Court would be graciously pleased to: ISSUE RULE NISI calling upon the opposite parties to show cause as to why a writ in the nature of mandamus/certiorari and/or any other appropriate writ/writs or order/orders and/or direction shall not be passed to accept the petition for correction for ROR and passed appropriate order as per the Gazette Notification dated 12.11.2025 and SOP issued thereafter. If the Opposite Parties fail to show cause or show inadequate or false cause, make the aforesaid rule nisi absolute. And pass such further order/orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem just and proper in order to provide the Petition Complete Relief. And for their act of kindness, the petitioner shall as in duty bound, remain ever pray.” 1 | P a g e

3. It is submitted by the petitioner that he acquired the property by virtue of a deed executed on 21.04.1978 by the recorded owner. However, he could neither mutate the property in his name nor make necessary application during settlement operations. As such the property got recorded in the name of the legal heirs of the vendor of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the amended Clause-g of Rule 34 of the OSS Rules applies to the case of the petitioner in full force. It is further submitted that the petitioner has already submitted an application before the Tahasildar, Sukruli seeking necessary correction of the record. 4. Such being the case, the writ application is disposed of directing the Tahasildar, Sukruli to consider the application of the petitioner in light of the amended Clause-g of Rule 34 of the OSS Rules and if satisfied as regards to its applicability to the facts of the case, pass appropriate order as early as possible. 5. Issue urgent certified copy as per Rules. (Sashikanta Mishra) Judge Deepak Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: DEEPAK PARIDA Reason: Authentication Location: OHC,Cuttack Date: 12-Aug-2026 18:24:23 2 | P a g e

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C). No. 25230 of 2026 ODHC010595932026 Singada Weekly `…. Petitioner Market, Mayurbhanj Represented by Mr. K.K.Nayak, Advocate -Versus - State of Odisha and …. Opposite Parties Ors Represented by Mr. S.N.Pattnaik, AGA CORAM: JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA ORDER_ 12.08.2026Order No. 01. 1. This matter is taken up through virtual mode. 2. The petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayer: “It is, therefore prayed that, the Hon’ble Court would be graciously pleased to: ISSUE RULE NISI calling upon the opposite parties to show cause as to why a writ in the nature of mandamus/certiorari and/or any other appropriate writ/writs or order/orders and/or direction shall not be passed to accept the petition for correction for ROR and passed appropriate order as per the Gazette Notification dated 12.11.2025 and SOP issued thereafter. If the Opposite Parties fail to show cause or show inadequate or false cause, make the aforesaid rule nisi absolute. And pass such further order/orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem just and proper in order to provide the Petition Complete Relief. And for their act of kindness, the petitioner shall as in duty bound, remain ever pray.” 1 | P a g e

3. It is submitted by the petitioner that he acquired the property by virtue of a deed executed on 21.04.1978 by the recorded owner. However, he could neither mutate the property in his name nor make necessary application during settlement operations. As such the property got recorded in the name of the legal heirs of the vendor of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the amended Clause-g of Rule 34 of the OSS Rules applies to the case of the petitioner in full force. It is further submitted that the petitioner has already submitted an application before the Tahasildar, Sukruli seeking necessary correction of the record. 4. Such being the case, the writ application is disposed of directing the Tahasildar, Sukruli to consider the application of the petitioner in light of the amended Clause-g of Rule 34 of the OSS Rules and if satisfied as regards to its applicability to the facts of the case, pass appropriate order as early as possible. 5. Issue urgent certified copy as per Rules. (Sashikanta Mishra) Judge Deepak Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: DEEPAK PARIDA Reason: Authentication Location: OHC,Cuttack Date: 12-Aug-2026 18:24:23 2 | P a g e