Orissa High Court
Panchanan Jena v. State of Orissa
WP(C)/22710/2026
- Decision date
- 2026-07-30
- Text availability
- Full text
- Judges
- Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗
Connected provisions and cases
No further provision or case links are recorded.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No.22710 of 2026 Sri Panchanan Jena …. Petitioner Mr. P.K. Mishra, Adv. -versus- State of Odisha & …. Opp. Parties Others Mr. S.P. Das, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER 30.07.2026 Order No 01. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties. 3. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:-“It is prayed, therefore that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to; (i) Admit and allow the writ petition and; (ii) Direct the Opposite Parties to regularize the service of the petitioner under regular establishment retrospectively prior to his retirement and to grant the petitioner pension and other retirement dues under old OCS (Pension) Rules, 1992 by counting past service rendered in D.L.R. as well as Work charged establishment with service rendered in regular establishment forthwith as has been granted to other similar footing employees within a stipulated period of time and; (iii) And pass such other orders/ directions as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and // 2 // proper in the facts and circumstances of the case and bona-fide interest of Justice.”
4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner state that highlighting his grievances, Petitioner has made a representation before Opposite Party No.1 vide Annexure-6 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, to which learned Counsel for the State has no objection. 5. As agreed by learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the Writ Petition directing Opposite Party No.1 to consider the representation filed by the Petitioner vide Annexure-6 within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of this order with due communication to the Petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Madhusmita Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: MADHUSMITA MALLICK Designation: Jr. Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK Date: 31-Jul-2026 16:04:42 Page 2 of 2