IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.19849 of 2026 Nayana Das .… Petitioner Represented by Mr. A.M.Das, Advocate -Versus- State of Odisha & Ors .… Opp. Parties Represented by Mr. G.Mohanty, Standing Counsel CORAM: JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA ORDER 30.07.2026 Order No. 1. This matter is taken up through virtual mode. 01. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State. 3. The petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayer:- “In this circumstance it is humble prayed before this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue Notice to the O.Ps to why this case shall not be allowed and O.P. No.4 i.e. Tahasildar, Cuttack Sadar directed to publication of ROR after completion of mutation proceeding issued ROR in favour of husband of the petitioner for the interest of justice. And pass any other order/orders, direction/directions as deemed fit and proper; And for which act of kindness the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray.” 4. In course of hearing of the writ application, it is brought to the notice of this Court that by highlighting the same grievance, the Page 1 of 2 petitioner has already submitted a representation addressed to the Tahasildar on 12.01.2026. 5. Considering the above fact, the writ application is disposed of directing the Tahasildar, Cuttack Sadar to consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioner by passing a reasoned order within four weeks from today.

(Sashikanta Mishra) Judge Deepak Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: DEEPAK PARIDA Reason: Authentication Location: OHC, Cuttack Date: 30-Jul-2026 18:16:58 Page 2 of 2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.19849 of 2026 Nayana Das .… Petitioner Represented by Mr. A.M.Das, Advocate -Versus- State of Odisha & Ors .… Opp. Parties Represented by Mr. G.Mohanty, Standing Counsel CORAM: JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA ORDER 30.07.2026 Order No. 1. This matter is taken up through virtual mode. 01. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State. 3. The petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayer:- “In this circumstance it is humble prayed before this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue Notice to the O.Ps to why this case shall not be allowed and O.P. No.4 i.e. Tahasildar, Cuttack Sadar directed to publication of ROR after completion of mutation proceeding issued ROR in favour of husband of the petitioner for the interest of justice. And pass any other order/orders, direction/directions as deemed fit and proper; And for which act of kindness the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray.” 4. In course of hearing of the writ application, it is brought to the notice of this Court that by highlighting the same grievance, the Page 1 of 2 petitioner has already submitted a representation addressed to the Tahasildar on 12.01.2026. 5. Considering the above fact, the writ application is disposed of directing the Tahasildar, Cuttack Sadar to consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioner by passing a reasoned order within four weeks from today.

(Sashikanta Mishra) Judge Deepak Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: DEEPAK PARIDA Reason: Authentication Location: OHC, Cuttack Date: 30-Jul-2026 18:16:58 Page 2 of 2