IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 13457 of 2011 Ranjit Kumar Parija …. Petitioner Mr. Subrat Kumar Das, Advocate -versus- 1.Manasi Parija …. Opp. Parties 2.Priyanka Parija Ms. A. Ray, learned counsel on behalf of Mr. B.K. Ragada, Advocate CORAM: HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO ORDER Order No. 28.07.2026 05. (Through hybrid Mode) 1. This Writ Petition has been filed challenging the order dated 23.04.2011 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Bhubaneswar in C.P. No. 481/2011 (Annexure-1), directing the Petitioner to pay an amount of Rs.6,000/- towards the maintenance of his daughter- Opposite Party No.2. 2. While issuing notice on 16.05.2011, as an interim measure this Court had directed that in place of Rs.6,000/-, Rs. 5,000/- should be paid towards monthly maintenance. 3. Mr. S. K. Das, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the in the meanwhile, Opposite Party No.2 has Page 1 of 2 become a major and as the marriage between the Petitioner and Opposite Party No.1 has been dissolved by a decree of divorce, nothing remains to be decided in this Writ Petition. 4. As no useful purpose will be served by keeping it pending, considering the said submission, the Writ Petition is disposed of. 5. Pending interim application, if any, stand disposed of. (Savitri Ratho) Judge Subhalaxmi Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: SUBHALAXMI PRIYADARSHANI SAHOO Reason: Authentication

Location: Orissa High Court, Cuttack Date: 30-Jul-2026 20:06:23 Page 2 of 2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 13457 of 2011 Ranjit Kumar Parija …. Petitioner Mr. Subrat Kumar Das, Advocate -versus- 1.Manasi Parija …. Opp. Parties 2.Priyanka Parija Ms. A. Ray, learned counsel on behalf of Mr. B.K. Ragada, Advocate CORAM: HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO ORDER Order No. 28.07.2026 05. (Through hybrid Mode) 1. This Writ Petition has been filed challenging the order dated 23.04.2011 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Bhubaneswar in C.P. No. 481/2011 (Annexure-1), directing the Petitioner to pay an amount of Rs.6,000/- towards the maintenance of his daughter- Opposite Party No.2. 2. While issuing notice on 16.05.2011, as an interim measure this Court had directed that in place of Rs.6,000/-, Rs. 5,000/- should be paid towards monthly maintenance. 3. Mr. S. K. Das, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the in the meanwhile, Opposite Party No.2 has Page 1 of 2 become a major and as the marriage between the Petitioner and Opposite Party No.1 has been dissolved by a decree of divorce, nothing remains to be decided in this Writ Petition. 4. As no useful purpose will be served by keeping it pending, considering the said submission, the Writ Petition is disposed of. 5. Pending interim application, if any, stand disposed of. (Savitri Ratho) Judge Subhalaxmi Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: SUBHALAXMI PRIYADARSHANI SAHOO Reason: Authentication

Location: Orissa High Court, Cuttack Date: 30-Jul-2026 20:06:23 Page 2 of 2