IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CMP No. 1476 of 2016 Raghunath Nayak …. Petitioners None -versus- 1.Bijay Kumar Das 2.Prafulla Das 3.Prasanna Kumar Das 4.Mahendra Das 5.Suryamani Das 6.Golak Das 7.Achutananda Das 8.Latika Das 9.Gobinda Das …. Opp. Parties None CORAM: HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO ORDER Order No. 23.07.2026 06. (Through hybrid Mode) 1. None appears for the Petitioners and the Opposite Parties, when the matter is called. 2. This CMP has been filed challenging the order dated 17.09.2016 (Annexure-6) passed by the learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, Jajpur in IA No. 32 of 2016 arising out of C.S. No. 138 of 2014 allowing the petition of the Opposite Party No. 1 to 3 under Section 151 C.P.C. for thatching of their house. Page 1 of 2 3. Although notice in the matter had been issued on 04.10.2016, but no interim order has been passed. 4. In view of the nature of order which has been challenged and passage of almost 10 years in the meanwhile, it can safely be presumed that the Opposite Parties must have thatched their house. 5. Hence this CMP is dismissed. (Savitri Ratho) Judge Subhalaxmi Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: SUBHALAXMI PRIYADARSHANI SAHOO Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court, Cuttack Date: 23-Jul-2026 19:03:24 Page 2 of 2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CMP No. 1476 of 2016 Raghunath Nayak …. Petitioners None -versus- 1.Bijay Kumar Das 2.Prafulla Das 3.Prasanna Kumar Das 4.Mahendra Das 5.Suryamani Das 6.Golak Das 7.Achutananda Das 8.Latika Das 9.Gobinda Das …. Opp. Parties None CORAM: HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO ORDER Order No. 23.07.2026 06. (Through hybrid Mode) 1. None appears for the Petitioners and the Opposite Parties, when the matter is called. 2. This CMP has been filed challenging the order dated 17.09.2016 (Annexure-6) passed by the learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, Jajpur in IA No. 32 of 2016 arising out of C.S. No. 138 of 2014 allowing the petition of the Opposite Party No. 1 to 3 under Section 151 C.P.C. for thatching of their house. Page 1 of 2 3. Although notice in the matter had been issued on 04.10.2016, but no interim order has been passed. 4. In view of the nature of order which has been challenged and passage of almost 10 years in the meanwhile, it can safely be presumed that the Opposite Parties must have thatched their house. 5. Hence this CMP is dismissed. (Savitri Ratho) Judge Subhalaxmi Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: SUBHALAXMI PRIYADARSHANI SAHOO Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court, Cuttack Date: 23-Jul-2026 19:03:24 Page 2 of 2