IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No. 8055 of 2026 1. Akshaya Senapaty 2. Rupa Senapaty …. Petitioners 3. Srikant Dutta 4. Ruchika Senapaty 5. Rajkiran Senapaty Mr. B. Tripathy, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Mr. S. Panda, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH ORDER 22.07.2026 Order No. 01. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 2. This ABLAPL has been filed apprehending arrest pursuant to an F.I.R. likely to be instituted before Balianta P.S. and Mahila P.S., Bhubaneswar, Dist. Khurda, Odisha. 3. There is no cavil about maintainability of ABLAPL in the absence of an F.I.R., but on a close scrutiny of the recitals in the ABLAPL and on consideration of submissions of the learned counsel for the Petitioners, this Court is ex-facie not persuaded to hold that on the touchstone of the principles laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia & Others Vrs. State of Page 1 of 2 Punjab, reported in (1980) 2 SCC 565 and reiterated in the case of Dhanraj Aswani vs. Amar S. Mulchandani & Ors. reported in (2024) 10 SCC 336, there is any reasonable apprehension of arrest of the Petitioner. 4. Liberty is granted to the Petitioners to renew their prayer, if there is any fresh cause of action to apprehend arrest. 5. Accordingly, the ABLAPL stands disposed of. (V. NARASINGH) Judge Soumya Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: SOUMYA RANJAN SAMAL Reason: Authentication

Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 23-Jul-2026 19:55:53 Page 2 of 2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No. 8055 of 2026 1. Akshaya Senapaty 2. Rupa Senapaty …. Petitioners 3. Srikant Dutta 4. Ruchika Senapaty 5. Rajkiran Senapaty Mr. B. Tripathy, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Mr. S. Panda, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH ORDER 22.07.2026 Order No. 01. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 2. This ABLAPL has been filed apprehending arrest pursuant to an F.I.R. likely to be instituted before Balianta P.S. and Mahila P.S., Bhubaneswar, Dist. Khurda, Odisha. 3. There is no cavil about maintainability of ABLAPL in the absence of an F.I.R., but on a close scrutiny of the recitals in the ABLAPL and on consideration of submissions of the learned counsel for the Petitioners, this Court is ex-facie not persuaded to hold that on the touchstone of the principles laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia & Others Vrs. State of Page 1 of 2 Punjab, reported in (1980) 2 SCC 565 and reiterated in the case of Dhanraj Aswani vs. Amar S. Mulchandani & Ors. reported in (2024) 10 SCC 336, there is any reasonable apprehension of arrest of the Petitioner. 4. Liberty is granted to the Petitioners to renew their prayer, if there is any fresh cause of action to apprehend arrest. 5. Accordingly, the ABLAPL stands disposed of. (V. NARASINGH) Judge Soumya Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: SOUMYA RANJAN SAMAL Reason: Authentication

Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 23-Jul-2026 19:55:53 Page 2 of 2