IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No.7957 of 2026 Santosh Kumar Jena @ Bapina …. Petitioners and others Mr. P. Patnaik, Advocate -Versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Mr. S. Panda, ASC CORAM: MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK ORDER 29.07.2026 I.A. No.1350 of 2026 Order No. 02. 1. Heard learned counsels for the respective parties. 2. Instant I.A. is filed seeking modification of the Court’s order in the ABLAPL dated 21st July, 2026 for the reason stated. 3. It is submitted that petitioner Nos.1 and 2 are having antecedent and not petitioner No.3, hence, the order in the ABLAPL needs modification to that extent only. Considering the submission as above and State’s response, this Court is inclined to modify the ABLAPL. 4. Accordingly, it is ordered. 5. In the result, the I.A. is disposed of directing petitioners Nos.1 and 2 instead to furnish an undertaking for them having antecedents to not involve themselves in similar criminal Page 1 of 2 activities as was directed earlier for petitioner Nos.2 to 3. Rest part of the order remains unaltered and furthermore, the petitioners are allowed to surrender before the learned court below within an extended period of fifteen days to commence from today in compliance of the order in the ABLAPL. 6. Urgent copy of this order be issued as per rules. (R.K. Pattanaik) Judge Rojina Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: ROJINA SAHOO Designation: Junior Stenographer Reason: Authentication

Location: OHC, CTC Date: 31-Jul-2026 17:19:44 Page 2 of 2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No.7957 of 2026 Santosh Kumar Jena @ Bapina …. Petitioners and others Mr. P. Patnaik, Advocate -Versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Mr. S. Panda, ASC CORAM: MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK ORDER 29.07.2026 I.A. No.1350 of 2026 Order No. 02. 1. Heard learned counsels for the respective parties. 2. Instant I.A. is filed seeking modification of the Court’s order in the ABLAPL dated 21st July, 2026 for the reason stated. 3. It is submitted that petitioner Nos.1 and 2 are having antecedent and not petitioner No.3, hence, the order in the ABLAPL needs modification to that extent only. Considering the submission as above and State’s response, this Court is inclined to modify the ABLAPL. 4. Accordingly, it is ordered. 5. In the result, the I.A. is disposed of directing petitioners Nos.1 and 2 instead to furnish an undertaking for them having antecedents to not involve themselves in similar criminal Page 1 of 2 activities as was directed earlier for petitioner Nos.2 to 3. Rest part of the order remains unaltered and furthermore, the petitioners are allowed to surrender before the learned court below within an extended period of fifteen days to commence from today in compliance of the order in the ABLAPL. 6. Urgent copy of this order be issued as per rules. (R.K. Pattanaik) Judge Rojina Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: ROJINA SAHOO Designation: Junior Stenographer Reason: Authentication

Location: OHC, CTC Date: 31-Jul-2026 17:19:44 Page 2 of 2