IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.17432 of 2026 Mahanadi Coalfields Limited & …. Petitioners another Mr. Saktidhar Das, Senior Advocate being assisted by Mr. Haripada Mohanty, Advocate -versus- Kuhuru Pradhan and others …. Opposite Parties CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN ORDER Order No. 20.07.2026

01. 1. Mr. Saktidhar Das, learned senior counsel being assisted by Mr. Haripada Mohanty, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners referred to the order dated 21st November, 2013 passed in T.C. No.27 of 2004 by the learned District and Sessions Judge-Cum-P.T.T.C.B.A.(O), Talcher, wherein the following order is passed: “A joint memo of compromise duly signed by the advocate for the reference as well as the advocate for claimant stating therein that the claimants are agreed to receive the compensation amount @ Rs.1,90,000/- per acre for Sadar land and Rs.1,75,000/- per acre for all other Kisam of land such as Taila, Adi and Jalasaya with other statutory benefits such as escalation, solatium and interest and also the reference is agreed for the same. Heard. In view of the memo, the claimant/claimants/ is are entitled to receive the compensation amount of Rs.9,221.18/- (Nine thousand two hundred twenty one rupees eighteen paisa) only along with interest @9% and 15% per annum as per the notification of the Govt. of India, Ministry of Energy, Department of Coal vide office order No.43020/28/86 Law dtd.12.05.89 till 31.12.2013 and to deposit the differential amount (fresh calculation-(minus) amount deposited+(plus) accrued interest) by the end of March, 2014 for payment to the claimant failing which the entire compensation amount (Principal+Interest+escalation+ solatium) shall carry Page 1 of 4

further interest @15% per annum from the date of notification U/s 4(1) of the Act till realized.” 2. Learned Senior Counsel submitted that the petitioners are aggrieved by the observation with respect to the imposition of interest @15% per annum from the date of the Notification under Section 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957. He submitted that in view of Section 161 of the said Act, 1957, the interest can at best be imposed @5% per annum. He, therefore, submitted that the learned District and Sessions Judge-Cum-P.T.T.C.B.A.(O), Talcher (now renamed/redesignated as Full Time Tribunal under the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957) transgressed it jurisdiction by directing payment of interest @15% which runs contrary to the provision laid down in the statute. 2.1. In similar context in many other cases, one of which being F.A.O. No.440 of 2023 (Annexure-9), this Court on 19th January, 2026 has passed the following order: “1. Heard Mr. H. Mohanty, learned counsel for the Appellants. No one appears on call for the claimants – Respondents despite the name of their Lawyer is indicated in the list.

2. It is submitted on behalf of the Appellants that the issue involved in the present appeal is squarely covered by the decision of this Court dated 22nd March 2024 passed in FAO No.863 of 2018, wherein this court by taking note of the provisions contained under Section 16 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 1 Interest on awards.— If the sum which in the opinion of the Tribunal ought to have been awarded as compensation is in excess of the sum which the Central Government has stated to be a fair amount of compensation, the award of the Tribunal may direct that the Central Government shall pay interest on such excess at the rate of five per centum per annum from the date on which it became payable to the date of payment of such excess. Page 2 of 4 has directed for reduction of the rate of interest up to 5% on the enhanced amount. 3. In the present facts of the case, as per the original award dated 22nd November 2013, the tribunal directs for payment of enhanced compensation amount of Rs.2,78,427.93 paise along with interest @of 9% and 15% per annum, as the case may be. It was further directed that the differential amount should be paid by end of March, 2014, failing which the entire compensation amount, i.e. Principal + interest + escalation + solatium, shall carry further interest @ 15% per annum from the date of notification under Section 4(1) of the Coal Bearing Areas Act, 1957.

4. Considering the principles settled in the earlier decision of this court dated 22°'' March, 2024 (referred above) the rate of interest is reduced to 5% from 15% on the differential amount without granting any further interest on the same. 5. Further taking note of the settled principles, the interest is liable to be calculated from the date of publication of Section 9(1) notification. 6. With aforesaid directions the appeal is disposed of.” 2.2. It is submitted by the learned Senior Counsel that in the identical set of fact-situation, this Court on 17th July, 2026 has passed the following order: “1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard Mr. H. Mohanty, learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he may be permitted to pursue his prayer before the Tribunal with permission to withdraw the writ petition. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn permitting the petitioner to pursue his prayer for reduction of interest before the Tribunal in T.C. Case No.68 of 2004. Page 3 of 4 5. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.”

2.3. It is impressed upon this Court that the opposite parties (7 in numbers herein) stand on the same footing as those were before this Court in W.P.(C) No.17451 of 2026 and F.A.O. No.440 of 2023 referred to supra. Hence, it is urged by the learned Senior Counsel that the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to approach the Full Time Tribunal constituted under the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 in terms of the orders of this Court dated 19th January, 2026 passed in FAO No.440 of 2023 (Annexure-9) and the order of this Court dated 17th July, 2026 passed in W.P.(C) No.17451 of 2026. 3. Having perused the orders cited and regard to the averments and contents of the writ petition, to cut short the delay, this Court without issuing any notice to the opposite parties, disposes the writ petition reserving liberty to the petitioners to pursue their grievance before the Full Time Tribunal in accordance with law. 4. As an abundant caution, this court has expressed no opinion on the merit of the case. (M.S. Raman) Judge MRS Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: MANORANJAN SAMAL Designation: PERSONAL ASSISTANT Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court, Cuttack Date: 21-Jul-2026 10:37:35 Page 4 of 4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.17432 of 2026 Mahanadi Coalfields Limited & …. Petitioners another Mr. Saktidhar Das, Senior Advocate being assisted by Mr. Haripada Mohanty, Advocate -versus- Kuhuru Pradhan and others …. Opposite Parties CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN ORDER Order No. 20.07.2026

01. 1. Mr. Saktidhar Das, learned senior counsel being assisted by Mr. Haripada Mohanty, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners referred to the order dated 21st November, 2013 passed in T.C. No.27 of 2004 by the learned District and Sessions Judge-Cum-P.T.T.C.B.A.(O), Talcher, wherein the following order is passed: “A joint memo of compromise duly signed by the advocate for the reference as well as the advocate for claimant stating therein that the claimants are agreed to receive the compensation amount @ Rs.1,90,000/- per acre for Sadar land and Rs.1,75,000/- per acre for all other Kisam of land such as Taila, Adi and Jalasaya with other statutory benefits such as escalation, solatium and interest and also the reference is agreed for the same. Heard. In view of the memo, the claimant/claimants/ is are entitled to receive the compensation amount of Rs.9,221.18/- (Nine thousand two hundred twenty one rupees eighteen paisa) only along with interest @9% and 15% per annum as per the notification of the Govt. of India, Ministry of Energy, Department of Coal vide office order No.43020/28/86 Law dtd.12.05.89 till 31.12.2013 and to deposit the differential amount (fresh calculation-(minus) amount deposited+(plus) accrued interest) by the end of March, 2014 for payment to the claimant failing which the entire compensation amount (Principal+Interest+escalation+ solatium) shall carry Page 1 of 4

further interest @15% per annum from the date of notification U/s 4(1) of the Act till realized.” 2. Learned Senior Counsel submitted that the petitioners are aggrieved by the observation with respect to the imposition of interest @15% per annum from the date of the Notification under Section 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957. He submitted that in view of Section 161 of the said Act, 1957, the interest can at best be imposed @5% per annum. He, therefore, submitted that the learned District and Sessions Judge-Cum-P.T.T.C.B.A.(O), Talcher (now renamed/redesignated as Full Time Tribunal under the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957) transgressed it jurisdiction by directing payment of interest @15% which runs contrary to the provision laid down in the statute. 2.1. In similar context in many other cases, one of which being F.A.O. No.440 of 2023 (Annexure-9), this Court on 19th January, 2026 has passed the following order: “1. Heard Mr. H. Mohanty, learned counsel for the Appellants. No one appears on call for the claimants – Respondents despite the name of their Lawyer is indicated in the list.

2. It is submitted on behalf of the Appellants that the issue involved in the present appeal is squarely covered by the decision of this Court dated 22nd March 2024 passed in FAO No.863 of 2018, wherein this court by taking note of the provisions contained under Section 16 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 1 Interest on awards.— If the sum which in the opinion of the Tribunal ought to have been awarded as compensation is in excess of the sum which the Central Government has stated to be a fair amount of compensation, the award of the Tribunal may direct that the Central Government shall pay interest on such excess at the rate of five per centum per annum from the date on which it became payable to the date of payment of such excess. Page 2 of 4 has directed for reduction of the rate of interest up to 5% on the enhanced amount. 3. In the present facts of the case, as per the original award dated 22nd November 2013, the tribunal directs for payment of enhanced compensation amount of Rs.2,78,427.93 paise along with interest @of 9% and 15% per annum, as the case may be. It was further directed that the differential amount should be paid by end of March, 2014, failing which the entire compensation amount, i.e. Principal + interest + escalation + solatium, shall carry further interest @ 15% per annum from the date of notification under Section 4(1) of the Coal Bearing Areas Act, 1957.

4. Considering the principles settled in the earlier decision of this court dated 22°'' March, 2024 (referred above) the rate of interest is reduced to 5% from 15% on the differential amount without granting any further interest on the same. 5. Further taking note of the settled principles, the interest is liable to be calculated from the date of publication of Section 9(1) notification. 6. With aforesaid directions the appeal is disposed of.” 2.2. It is submitted by the learned Senior Counsel that in the identical set of fact-situation, this Court on 17th July, 2026 has passed the following order: “1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard Mr. H. Mohanty, learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he may be permitted to pursue his prayer before the Tribunal with permission to withdraw the writ petition. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn permitting the petitioner to pursue his prayer for reduction of interest before the Tribunal in T.C. Case No.68 of 2004. Page 3 of 4 5. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.”

2.3. It is impressed upon this Court that the opposite parties (7 in numbers herein) stand on the same footing as those were before this Court in W.P.(C) No.17451 of 2026 and F.A.O. No.440 of 2023 referred to supra. Hence, it is urged by the learned Senior Counsel that the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to approach the Full Time Tribunal constituted under the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 in terms of the orders of this Court dated 19th January, 2026 passed in FAO No.440 of 2023 (Annexure-9) and the order of this Court dated 17th July, 2026 passed in W.P.(C) No.17451 of 2026. 3. Having perused the orders cited and regard to the averments and contents of the writ petition, to cut short the delay, this Court without issuing any notice to the opposite parties, disposes the writ petition reserving liberty to the petitioners to pursue their grievance before the Full Time Tribunal in accordance with law. 4. As an abundant caution, this court has expressed no opinion on the merit of the case. (M.S. Raman) Judge MRS Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: MANORANJAN SAMAL Designation: PERSONAL ASSISTANT Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court, Cuttack Date: 21-Jul-2026 10:37:35 Page 4 of 4