Orissa High Court
Tripura Nayak v. State of Odisha
WP(C)/20831/2026
- Decision date
- 2026-07-13
- Text availability
- Full text
- Judges
- Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗
Connected provisions and cases
No further provision or case links are recorded.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 20831 of 2026 Tripura Nayak ..... Petitioner Mr. K.C. Sahu, Adv. -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. S.P. Das, ASC CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER 13.07.2026 Order No. 01 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the Opp. Parties. 3. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:- “It is therefore prayed that the Hon'ble Court be graciously pleased to pass following relief(s):- (i) The Hon'ble Court be pleased to admit & allow this writ petition. (ii) That the Hon'ble Court be graciously pleased to direct the Opp. Party no. 2 to 4 for regularization of the service of the petitioner on the basis of the 105th Minutes of BoD Meeting held on 20.02.2019 as per the Agenda no-5 at par with similar situated employees regularized as per Agenda No-2 so also resolution No. 1923 under Annexure-3 from the date of completion of 10 years of service with all consequential service and financial Page 1 of 2. benefits within a time bound period for the interest of justice. (iii) The Hon'ble court be pleased to pass any other order(s)/direction(s) as deems fit & proper for the bonafide interest of justice. And for this act of kindness, the Petitioner shall as in duty bound ever pray;”
4. However, taking into account the claim raised in the present Writ Petition, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to make a detailed representation before Opp. Party No.3 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of his claim, if any, within a period of three weeks hence. 5. It is observed that if such a representation is filed within the aforesaid period, Opp. Party No.3 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of three months from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by the Opp. Party No.3 be communicated to the petitioner within the aforesaid time period. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. (BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY) Judge Jyoti Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: JYOTIPRAVA BHOL Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA Date: 14-Jul-2026 12:17:55 Page 2 of 2.