IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No.6923 of 2026 Sidhartha Chand …. Petitioner Mr. A. R. Panda, Advocate -Versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Ms. B. K. Sahu, AGA ABLAPL No.6807 of 2026 Bijay Kumar Dalei @ Bijay Dalei …. Petitioner Mr. A. R. Panda, Advocate -Versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Ms. B. K. Sahu, AGA ABLAPL No.6851 of 2026 Abhiram Dalei …. Petitioner Mr. A. R. Panda, Advocate -Versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Ms. B. K. Sahu, AGA And ABLAPL No.6932 of 2026 Mohit Senapati …. Petitioner Mr. A. R. Panda, Advocate -Versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Ms. B. K. Sahu, AGA Page 1 of 3 CORAM: MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK ORDER 30.06.2026Order No. 01. 1. All the ABLAPLs are taken up together and disposed of following by the following common order. 2. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. 3. Instant petitions under Section 482 BNSS are filed by the petitioners seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with Baisinga P.S. Case No. 142 of 2026 corresponding to C.T. Case No.345 of 2026 pending in the file of learned J.M.F.C., Betnoti on the grounds stated.

4. The petitioners had earlier approached this Court filing the ABLAPLs disposed of allowing them the liberty to approach the Sessions Court. Mr. Panda, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners did approach the Sessions Court but not within the time stipulated, hence, it was disposed of on technical ground. Considering such submission and response of Ms. Sahu, learned AGA for the State, this Court is inclined to reiterate the earlier orders in the ABLAPLs and to grant the liberty to the petitioners to renew the prayer before the court of learned Sessions Judge, Mayurbhanj, Baripada for orders within the stipulated period. 5. Accordingly, it is ordered. Page 2 of 3 6. In the result, the ABLAPLs are disposed of allowing the petitioners to file applications demanding pre-arrest bail before the Sessions Court within a fortnight from today and till such time, it is directed that there shall be no coercive action taken against them in connection with Baisinga P.S. Case No.142 of 2026 corresponding to C.T. Case No.345 of 2026. Any such plea with regard to release of the accused persons may also be considered by the Sessions Court while dealing with the applications of the petitioners and only if they had applied pre-arrest bail earlier pursuant to the orders in the ABLAPLs said to have been disposed of on technical ground. 7. Issue urgent certified copy of this order as per rules. (R.K. Pattanaik) Judge Rojina Signature Not Verified

Digitally Signed Signed by: ROJINA SAHOO Designation: Junior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: OHC, CTC Date: 02-Jul-2026 16:55:15 Page 3 of 3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No.6923 of 2026 Sidhartha Chand …. Petitioner Mr. A. R. Panda, Advocate -Versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Ms. B. K. Sahu, AGA ABLAPL No.6807 of 2026 Bijay Kumar Dalei @ Bijay Dalei …. Petitioner Mr. A. R. Panda, Advocate -Versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Ms. B. K. Sahu, AGA ABLAPL No.6851 of 2026 Abhiram Dalei …. Petitioner Mr. A. R. Panda, Advocate -Versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Ms. B. K. Sahu, AGA And ABLAPL No.6932 of 2026 Mohit Senapati …. Petitioner Mr. A. R. Panda, Advocate -Versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Ms. B. K. Sahu, AGA Page 1 of 3 CORAM: MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK ORDER 30.06.2026Order No. 01. 1. All the ABLAPLs are taken up together and disposed of following by the following common order. 2. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. 3. Instant petitions under Section 482 BNSS are filed by the petitioners seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with Baisinga P.S. Case No. 142 of 2026 corresponding to C.T. Case No.345 of 2026 pending in the file of learned J.M.F.C., Betnoti on the grounds stated.

4. The petitioners had earlier approached this Court filing the ABLAPLs disposed of allowing them the liberty to approach the Sessions Court. Mr. Panda, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners did approach the Sessions Court but not within the time stipulated, hence, it was disposed of on technical ground. Considering such submission and response of Ms. Sahu, learned AGA for the State, this Court is inclined to reiterate the earlier orders in the ABLAPLs and to grant the liberty to the petitioners to renew the prayer before the court of learned Sessions Judge, Mayurbhanj, Baripada for orders within the stipulated period. 5. Accordingly, it is ordered. Page 2 of 3 6. In the result, the ABLAPLs are disposed of allowing the petitioners to file applications demanding pre-arrest bail before the Sessions Court within a fortnight from today and till such time, it is directed that there shall be no coercive action taken against them in connection with Baisinga P.S. Case No.142 of 2026 corresponding to C.T. Case No.345 of 2026. Any such plea with regard to release of the accused persons may also be considered by the Sessions Court while dealing with the applications of the petitioners and only if they had applied pre-arrest bail earlier pursuant to the orders in the ABLAPLs said to have been disposed of on technical ground. 7. Issue urgent certified copy of this order as per rules. (R.K. Pattanaik) Judge Rojina Signature Not Verified

Digitally Signed Signed by: ROJINA SAHOO Designation: Junior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: OHC, CTC Date: 02-Jul-2026 16:55:15 Page 3 of 3