Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: MANAS KUMAR PANDA Reason: Authentication Location: OHC, Cuttack Date: 24-Jun-2026 18:44:21 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK FAO No.692 of 2026 Budhi Sahu …. Appellant Mr. Satyaban Sahoo, Advocate -versus- Union of India, represented through its General Manager, Central Railway, …. Respondent Mumbai Mr. D.P. Patnaik, CGC CORAM: JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY ORDER 23.6.2026 Order No. 01. 1. Heard Mr. S. Sahoo, learned counsel for the claimant -Appellant and Mr. D.P. Patnaik, learned CGC for Respondent -Union of India. 2. It is submitted on behalf of the Appellant that challenge in the present appeal against the direction of keeping 90% of the compensation amount in fixed deposit is covered by a similar judgment of this court. 3. It is admitted by both parties that the challenge in the present appeal is squarely covered by the decision of this Court rendered in FAO No.262 of 2020 and batch, disposed of on 9th September, 2021. 4. Accordingly, present appeal is disposed of in terms of the principles decided in said decision of this Court with a direction Page 1 of 2 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: MANAS KUMAR PANDA Reason: Authentication Location: OHC, Cuttack Date: 24-Jun-2026 18:44:21 to disburse entire compensation amount in favour of the claimant by keeping 50% of the same in fixed deposit in her name in any Nationalized bank for a period of five years.

5. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the FAO is disposed of. 6. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application. ( B.P. Routray) Judge M.K. Panda Page 2 of 2

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: MANAS KUMAR PANDA Reason: Authentication Location: OHC, Cuttack Date: 24-Jun-2026 18:44:21 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK FAO No.692 of 2026 Budhi Sahu …. Appellant Mr. Satyaban Sahoo, Advocate -versus- Union of India, represented through its General Manager, Central Railway, …. Respondent Mumbai Mr. D.P. Patnaik, CGC CORAM: JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY ORDER 23.6.2026 Order No. 01. 1. Heard Mr. S. Sahoo, learned counsel for the claimant -Appellant and Mr. D.P. Patnaik, learned CGC for Respondent -Union of India. 2. It is submitted on behalf of the Appellant that challenge in the present appeal against the direction of keeping 90% of the compensation amount in fixed deposit is covered by a similar judgment of this court. 3. It is admitted by both parties that the challenge in the present appeal is squarely covered by the decision of this Court rendered in FAO No.262 of 2020 and batch, disposed of on 9th September, 2021. 4. Accordingly, present appeal is disposed of in terms of the principles decided in said decision of this Court with a direction Page 1 of 2 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: MANAS KUMAR PANDA Reason: Authentication Location: OHC, Cuttack Date: 24-Jun-2026 18:44:21 to disburse entire compensation amount in favour of the claimant by keeping 50% of the same in fixed deposit in her name in any Nationalized bank for a period of five years.

5. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the FAO is disposed of. 6. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application. ( B.P. Routray) Judge M.K. Panda Page 2 of 2