IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No.6699 of 2026 1) Rahul Padhiari @ Rahul ..... Petitioners Padhari 2) Sanjay Padhiari Represented by Adv. - 3) Shyama Padhiari Amitav Tripathy 4) Satya Padhiari 5) Kishore Padhiari 6) Kumari Padhiari 7) Pramila Padhiari -versus- state of odisha ..... Opposite Parties Represented by Adv. – Mr.S.K.Parhi, ASC CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA ORDER 19.06.2026 Order No. 01. 1. This matter is taken up through Virtual Mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners, learned counsel for the informant and learned counsel for the State. Perused the anticipatory bail application as well as the F.I.R. 3. This is an application under Section 482 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 filed by the Petitioners for anticipatory bail, involving offence punishable under Sections 109/ 118(1)/118(2)/ 296/ 3(5)/ 351(2)/ 351(3)/ 74 of the BNS 2023 in G.R Case No.421 of 2026 in the Court of learned S.D.J.M., Nayagarh arising out of Itamati P.S Case No.140 of 2026. 4. It is stated by the learned counsel for the Petitioners that, Page 1 of 3.

there exists a rivalry between two groups. He further contended that scuffle took place between two groups, as a result of which, both side have sustained some injuries. The learned counsel for the Petitioners submitted that injury sustained by the injured are simple in nature. It was also contended that they belongs to the locality, therefore, there is no chance of absconding against them. On such grounds, the learned counsel for the Petitioners prayed that the Petitioners be released on pre-arrest bail. 5. The learned counsel for the State on the other hand objected to the release of the petitioners on bail on the ground of gravity and seriousness of the allegation. 6. The learned counsel for the informant submitted that in the meantime, the matter has already been amicably settled between the parties. 7. Learned counsel for the Petitioners, at the outset, submitted that the Petitioners do not want to press this bail application and seek liberty to surrender before the court below and move an application for bail.

8. Considering such submissions, the Petitioners are permitted to surrender before the learned court in seisin over the matter within a period of three weeks from today and move an application for bail. In such eventuality, learned court in seisin over the matter shall release the Petitioners on bail subject to such terms and conditions as the learned Magistrate may deem just and proper. Violation of any of the terms and conditions shall entail cancellation of the bail. Page 2 of 3. 9. The ABLAPL is disposed of accordingly. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted as per rules. ( A.K. Mohapatra ) Vacation Judge Binayak Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: BINAYAK SAHOO Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 22-Jun-2026 17:38:32 Page 3 of 3.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No.6699 of 2026 1) Rahul Padhiari @ Rahul ..... Petitioners Padhari 2) Sanjay Padhiari Represented by Adv. - 3) Shyama Padhiari Amitav Tripathy 4) Satya Padhiari 5) Kishore Padhiari 6) Kumari Padhiari 7) Pramila Padhiari -versus- state of odisha ..... Opposite Parties Represented by Adv. – Mr.S.K.Parhi, ASC CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA ORDER 19.06.2026 Order No. 01. 1. This matter is taken up through Virtual Mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners, learned counsel for the informant and learned counsel for the State. Perused the anticipatory bail application as well as the F.I.R. 3. This is an application under Section 482 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 filed by the Petitioners for anticipatory bail, involving offence punishable under Sections 109/ 118(1)/118(2)/ 296/ 3(5)/ 351(2)/ 351(3)/ 74 of the BNS 2023 in G.R Case No.421 of 2026 in the Court of learned S.D.J.M., Nayagarh arising out of Itamati P.S Case No.140 of 2026. 4. It is stated by the learned counsel for the Petitioners that, Page 1 of 3.

there exists a rivalry between two groups. He further contended that scuffle took place between two groups, as a result of which, both side have sustained some injuries. The learned counsel for the Petitioners submitted that injury sustained by the injured are simple in nature. It was also contended that they belongs to the locality, therefore, there is no chance of absconding against them. On such grounds, the learned counsel for the Petitioners prayed that the Petitioners be released on pre-arrest bail. 5. The learned counsel for the State on the other hand objected to the release of the petitioners on bail on the ground of gravity and seriousness of the allegation. 6. The learned counsel for the informant submitted that in the meantime, the matter has already been amicably settled between the parties. 7. Learned counsel for the Petitioners, at the outset, submitted that the Petitioners do not want to press this bail application and seek liberty to surrender before the court below and move an application for bail.

8. Considering such submissions, the Petitioners are permitted to surrender before the learned court in seisin over the matter within a period of three weeks from today and move an application for bail. In such eventuality, learned court in seisin over the matter shall release the Petitioners on bail subject to such terms and conditions as the learned Magistrate may deem just and proper. Violation of any of the terms and conditions shall entail cancellation of the bail. Page 2 of 3. 9. The ABLAPL is disposed of accordingly. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted as per rules. ( A.K. Mohapatra ) Vacation Judge Binayak Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: BINAYAK SAHOO Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 22-Jun-2026 17:38:32 Page 3 of 3.