Madhya Pradesh High Court

Smt. Sandhya Mishra v. Atul Mishra

CRR/1930/2019

Decision date
2026-07-16
Text availability
Full text

Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗

Connected provisions and cases

No further provision or case links are recorded.

Judgment text

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR (VERMA) ON THE 20th OF JANUARY, 2023 CRIMINAL REVISION No. 1930 of 2019 BETWEEN:- 1. SMT. SANDHYA MISHRA W/O ATUL MISHRA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT STAFF NURSE, METRON, OFFICE, NETAJI SUBHASH CHAND BOSE MEDICAL COLLGE GARHA JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH) 2. MATER DEVANSH S/O ATUL MISHRA, AGED ABOUT 7 YEARS, THROUGH HIS NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER SMT. SANDHYA MISHRA W/O ATUL MISHRA, R/O C/O SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SHARMA NEAR KHEDAPATI MANDIR, NEW YARD, INDRA NAGAR ITARSI DISTRICT HOSHANGABAD (MADHYA PRADESH) .....PETITIONERS (NONE) AND ATUL MISHRA S/O LATE SHRI R.S. MISHRA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O 135/C, TRIMURTI NAGAR, NEAR GAYTRI MANDIR DAMOH NAKA (MADHYA PRADESH) .....RESPONDENT (NONE) This revision coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following: ORDER In the first round, this revision petition was dismissed vide order dated 25.02.2022 for want of prosecution because none appeared on behalf of the petitioner even in the second round. Thereafter, vide order dated 13.08.2022 passed in MCRC Signature Not Verified Signed by: KAFEEL AHMED ANSARI Signing time: 1/25/2023 5:08:30 PM 2 No.15926/2022, the petition was restored. Now, today also, none for the petitioner. It seems that the petitioner is not interested and serious in prosecuting the present revision petition.

Hence, the revision petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. (RAJENDRA KUMAR (VERMA)) JUDGE kafeel Signature Not Verified Signed by: KAFEEL AHMED ANSARI Signing time: 1/25/2023 5:08:30 PM