Manipur High Court

Ranjan Yumnam v. Nejolata Haobijam

Decision date
2026-08-19
Text availability
Full text
Judges
A. Guneshwar Sharma

Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗

Connected provisions and cases

No further provision or case links are recorded.

Judgment text

Oinam Item no. 2-4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR Thoiba Meitei AT IMPHAL Digitally signed by CRP(C.R.P. Art. 227) No. 37 of 2026 with Oinam Thoiba Meitei MC(CRP(CRP Art. 227)) No. 61 of 2026 withDate: 2026.08.21 10:28:08 +05'30' MC(CRP(CRP Art. 227)) No. 63 of 2026 Ranjan Yumnam …. Petitioner - Versus– Nejolata Haobijam ….Respondent B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A. GUNESHWAR SHARMA ORDER 20.08.2026 [1] Heard Mr. Ajoy Pebam, learned counsel for the petitioner. [2] The petitioner/applicant filed the present application being MC(CRP(CRP Art. 227)) No. 63 of 2026 for allowing to file accompanying petition challenging the impugned order dated 18.04.2026 passed by the learned Family Court, Imphal East without certify copy and on the basis of true copy. It is submitted that the certify copy of the same has already been filed while filing the review petition against the same order and the true copy annexed with the present application is the excess representation of the order. It is submitted that making for certify copy will take time and it is submitted that certify copy of the order will be submitted as and when the same delivered by the competent authority. In the circumstances, the application being MC(CRP(CRP Art. 227)) No. 63 of 2026 is allowed. The accompanying petition under article 227 of the Constitution challenging the order dated 18.04.2026 be number, if the same is in order. [3] List the remaining cases on 24.08.2026 in motion column. JUDGE Thoiba