Manipur High Court

Phijam (N) Laitonjam (O) Shobhapati Devi & Ors. v. Phijam Chaoba Singh

Decision date
2026-05-06
Text availability
Full text
Judges
Chief Justice

Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗

Connected provisions and cases

No further provision or case links are recorded.

Judgment text

Digitally signed LAIRENM by AYUM LAIRENMAYUMINDRAJEET Item No. 4 INDRAJE SINGHDate: ET SINGH 2026.05.07 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR 16:28:21 +05'30' AT IMPHAL CRP(CRP.Art.227) No. 51 of 2023 Phijam (N) Laitonjam (O) Shobhapati Devi & 3 ors. Petitioner/s Vrs. Phijam Chaoba Singh Respondent/s BEFORE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. M. SUNDAR (ORDER) 07.05.2026 When the matter was taken up, Mr. Th. Mahira, learned counsel along with Mr. N. Vijay Kumar Singh, learned counsel on record for revision petitioners and Mr. Dayali Elangbam, learned counsel for sole respondent are before this Court. After some arguments, counsel on record for revision petitioners Mr. Th. Mahira sought leave of this Court to withdraw the captioned CRP(Civil Revision Petition) but made a plea to preserve the rights and contentions of the revision petitioners to take out an interlocutory application in Trial Court with a prayer qua sole respondent seeking injunction against putting up further constructions (superstructures). Leave sought and request are acceded to. Permitted to withdraw and rights and contentions of revision petitioners are preserved to the limited extent indicated herein. A scanned reproduction of endorsement made by learned counsel on record for revision petitioners in the case file is as follows: Page 1 of 2

If the revision petitioners take out an interlocutory application with an interim prayer qua sole respondent as regards putting up further constructions (superstructures), the same shall be considered on its own merits and in accordance with law by the Trial Court untrammeled by instant withdrawal. Rights of the revision petitioners are preserved to this limited extent. As regards main suit, though obvious, for the purpose of specificity it is made clear that the Trial Court shall proceed with the suit/trial on its own merits and in accordance with law untrammeled by withdrawal of captioned CRP. Captioned CRP is disposed of as withdrawn/closed albeit with limited preservation of rights in the aforesaid manner. There shall be no order as to costs. CHIEF JUSTICE Indrajeet Page 2 of 2