Crl.O.P.No.21549 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 06.08.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Crl.O.P.No.21549 of 2026 Ajithkumar ... Petitioner(s) Vs. The State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Race Course Police Station, Coimbatore City. ... Respondent(s) Crime No.227 of 2026 PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail concerned in Crime No.227 of 2026 pending on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner(s) : Mr.G.Vikram For Respondent(s) : Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 02.07.2026 for the alleged offences under Section 303(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, in Crime No.227 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.21549 of 2026 2. It is the case of the prosecution that the petitioner has stolen 5 HP Motors belonging to the defacto complainant. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the petitioner has been in custody since 02.07.2026 and is ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed for the grant of bail.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent, while opposing the grant of bail to the petitioner, reiterated the prosecution case and, on instructions, submitted that out of 5 HP Motors, 3 have been recovered. He further submitted that the petitioner was identified through CCTV footage. He also submitted that a major portion of the investigation has already been completed and that the petitioner has two previous cases, which are not of similar nature. 5. Though the petitioner has two previous cases, the same are not of similar nature. Hence, considering the totality of the circumstances, the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner, the fact that a major portion of the stolen property has been recovered from the petitioner, and also the fact that a 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.21549 of 2026 major portion of the investigation has already been completed, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail, subject to certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Coimbatore and subject to the following conditions: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police twice a day at 10.30 a.m. and 05.30 p.m. until further orders; [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] on breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions had been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court itself, as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.21549 of 2026 State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283]; [f] if the petitioner thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR may be registered under Section 269 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 06.08.2026 skr

Note: 1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court. 2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.21549 of 2026 To 1. The learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Coimbatore 2. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Coimbatore 3. The Inspector of Police, Race Course Police Station, Coimbatore City. 4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.21549 of 2026 C.KUMARAPPAN,J. skr Crl.O.P.No.21549 of 2026 06.08.2026 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.O.P.No.21549 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 06.08.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Crl.O.P.No.21549 of 2026 Ajithkumar ... Petitioner(s) Vs. The State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Race Course Police Station, Coimbatore City. ... Respondent(s) Crime No.227 of 2026 PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail concerned in Crime No.227 of 2026 pending on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner(s) : Mr.G.Vikram For Respondent(s) : Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 02.07.2026 for the alleged offences under Section 303(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, in Crime No.227 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.21549 of 2026 2. It is the case of the prosecution that the petitioner has stolen 5 HP Motors belonging to the defacto complainant. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the petitioner has been in custody since 02.07.2026 and is ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed for the grant of bail.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent, while opposing the grant of bail to the petitioner, reiterated the prosecution case and, on instructions, submitted that out of 5 HP Motors, 3 have been recovered. He further submitted that the petitioner was identified through CCTV footage. He also submitted that a major portion of the investigation has already been completed and that the petitioner has two previous cases, which are not of similar nature. 5. Though the petitioner has two previous cases, the same are not of similar nature. Hence, considering the totality of the circumstances, the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner, the fact that a major portion of the stolen property has been recovered from the petitioner, and also the fact that a 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.21549 of 2026 major portion of the investigation has already been completed, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail, subject to certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Coimbatore and subject to the following conditions: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police twice a day at 10.30 a.m. and 05.30 p.m. until further orders; [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] on breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions had been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court itself, as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.21549 of 2026 State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283]; [f] if the petitioner thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR may be registered under Section 269 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 06.08.2026 skr

Note: 1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court. 2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.21549 of 2026 To 1. The learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Coimbatore 2. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Coimbatore 3. The Inspector of Police, Race Course Police Station, Coimbatore City. 4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.21549 of 2026 C.KUMARAPPAN,J. skr Crl.O.P.No.21549 of 2026 06.08.2026 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis