R. Kumarasamy v. M. Sivakumar

Decision date: 2026-08-06
Text availability: Full text
Judges: G. R. Swaminathan, B. Pugalendhi

Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗

Connected provisions and cases

No further provision or case links are recorded.

Judgment text

Cont.P.(MD)No.2433 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 06.08.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Cont.P(MD)No.2433 of 2026 R.Kumarasamy ... Petitioner Vs. M.Sivakumar, Tahsildar / Terminating Committee, Thuraiyur Taluk, Trichy District. ... Respondent Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Court Act, to punish the contemnor / fifth respondent for willful disobedience of the order in W.P.(MD)No.3037 of 2026, dated 05.02.2026. For Petitioner :Mr.Purushothaman for Mr.K.N.Vijayasenthilkumar For Respondent :Mr.S.Siva Subramanian Government Advocate (Civil Side) 1/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.(MD)No.2433 of 2026 ORDER Heard both sides. 2. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents informs the Court that already notice under Section 7 of the Act has been issued. It is further undertaken that within eight weeks, encroachments will be cleared. 3. Recording the said undertaking, the contempt petition is closed. Liberty is given to the petitioner to make a mention for re-opening the contempt petition after a gap of eight weeks, if the undertaking is not honoured. [G.R.S., J.] [B.P., J.] 06.08.2026 NCC : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No rmi To Tahsildar / Terminating Committee, Thuraiyur Taluk, Trichy District. 2/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.(MD)No.2433 of 2026 G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J and

B.PUGALENDHI, J. rmi Cont.P(MD)No.2433 of 2026 06.08.2026 3/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis