CRL OP No. 19565 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 22-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 19565 of 2026 M.Manikandan ..Petitioner(s) Vs State Rep By Inspector of Police, Gummidipoondi Police Station, Gummidipoondi, Thiruvallur District. Crime No.79/2026 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Act, 2023 to enlarge the petitioner on Anticipatory Bail in the event of his arrest in pending investigation in Crime No.79 of 2026 on the file of the respondent. For Petitioner(s): M/S. M/s.D.Sam Nandha Kumar For Respondent(s): MR.N.PALANIVEL, GOVT.ADVOCATE (CRL.SIDE) ORDER The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 329(4), 296(b), 118(1), 351(3) of BNS, 2023 r/w 4 of TNHW Act in Crime No. 79 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail. __________ Page1 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 19565 of 2026 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner compelled the defacto complainant to speak with him, when she refused to do so, he abused the defacto complainant in a filthy language, assaulted her with knife and also threatened her with dire consequences. Hence, the case.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the defacto complainant and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submitted that he is ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court and ready to co-operate with the investigation. Hence, he prayed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the injured has been discharged from the hospital. He submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents. However, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5. I have given my anxious consideration to either side submissions and perused the materials available on record. __________ Page2 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 19565 of 2026

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, taking note of the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides, from the submissions made by learned Government Advocate(crl.side), it is seen that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents and the injured has been discharged from the hospital on the same day and also appeared that the petitioner and defacto complainant were acquainted to each other for some time. Hence, in such view of the circumstances, the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required. Hence, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to certain conditions. 7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, before the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Gummidipoondi on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only), with two sureties each, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, and on further conditions: (a) If the petitioner fails to surrender before the concerned learned Magistrate within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled; __________ Page3 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 19565 of 2026

(b) The sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the application for surety ship (Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019]'. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of identify proofs to ensure their identity; (c) The petitioner shall report before the respondent Police, everyday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation. (d) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate actions against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on anticipatory bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji v. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; (e) If the petitioner thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS Act. 22-07-2026 NR To: 1. The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Gummidipoondi 2. Inspector of Police, Gummidipoondi Police Station, Gummidipoondi, Thiruvallur District. 3. The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras __________ Page4 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 19565 of 2026 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. NR CRL OP No. 19565 of 2026 22-07-2026 __________ Page5 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

CRL OP No. 19565 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 22-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 19565 of 2026 M.Manikandan ..Petitioner(s) Vs State Rep By Inspector of Police, Gummidipoondi Police Station, Gummidipoondi, Thiruvallur District. Crime No.79/2026 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Act, 2023 to enlarge the petitioner on Anticipatory Bail in the event of his arrest in pending investigation in Crime No.79 of 2026 on the file of the respondent. For Petitioner(s): M/S. M/s.D.Sam Nandha Kumar For Respondent(s): MR.N.PALANIVEL, GOVT.ADVOCATE (CRL.SIDE) ORDER The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 329(4), 296(b), 118(1), 351(3) of BNS, 2023 r/w 4 of TNHW Act in Crime No. 79 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail. __________ Page1 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 19565 of 2026 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner compelled the defacto complainant to speak with him, when she refused to do so, he abused the defacto complainant in a filthy language, assaulted her with knife and also threatened her with dire consequences. Hence, the case.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the defacto complainant and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submitted that he is ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court and ready to co-operate with the investigation. Hence, he prayed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the injured has been discharged from the hospital. He submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents. However, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5. I have given my anxious consideration to either side submissions and perused the materials available on record. __________ Page2 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 19565 of 2026

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, taking note of the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides, from the submissions made by learned Government Advocate(crl.side), it is seen that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents and the injured has been discharged from the hospital on the same day and also appeared that the petitioner and defacto complainant were acquainted to each other for some time. Hence, in such view of the circumstances, the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required. Hence, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to certain conditions. 7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, before the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Gummidipoondi on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only), with two sureties each, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, and on further conditions: (a) If the petitioner fails to surrender before the concerned learned Magistrate within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled; __________ Page3 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 19565 of 2026

(b) The sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the application for surety ship (Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019]'. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of identify proofs to ensure their identity; (c) The petitioner shall report before the respondent Police, everyday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation. (d) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate actions against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on anticipatory bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji v. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; (e) If the petitioner thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS Act. 22-07-2026 NR To: 1. The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Gummidipoondi 2. Inspector of Police, Gummidipoondi Police Station, Gummidipoondi, Thiruvallur District. 3. The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras __________ Page4 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 19565 of 2026 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. NR CRL OP No. 19565 of 2026 22-07-2026 __________ Page5 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis