WP No. 21230 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 21230 of 2026 Arun Bhaskar S/o S.V. bhaskar, 7B Solomon Street Extension, East Tambaram, Kancheepuram 600 059 ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Inspector General of Registration No 100, Santhome High Road, Chennai 600 028 2. The District Registrar Chennai South, Chennai 600 015 3. The Sub Registrar Office of Sub Registrar, Neelankarai, Chennai 600 115 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the 3rd respondent culminating in Speaking order No 91/ 2026 dated 30.04.2026 and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law, and passed __________ Page1 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 21230 of 2026

in violation of this Honble Court direction dated 15.04.2026 and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to adjudicate the General Power of Attorney dated 06.03.2026 executed at Malaysia by the Principals Mrs. Saraswathy and Mr. Sivanesh in favour of the Petitioner in accordance with the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 without insisting upon the production of the original parent document (Sale Deed dated 03.08.1979 registered as Document No. 1221 of 1979) and Legal Heirship Certificates / Letters of Administration, and further consequently direct the 3rd respondent to accept and register the sale deed to be presented by executed by the petitioner based on the aforesaid adjudicated General power of Attorney. For Petitioner(s): Mr. Akshay Raam For Respondent(s): Mr. M. Roshan Atiq Government Counsel ORDER The present Writ Petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 30.04.2026, whereby the 3rd respondent refused to adjudicate the General Power of Attorney dated 06.03.2026. __________ Page2 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 21230 of 2026

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner had earlier filed a Writ Petition in W.P. No. 14135 of 2026 seeking a direction to the 2nd respondent to adjudicate the said General Power of Attorney. This Court, by an order dated 15.04.2026, directed the 3rd respondent to adjudicate the General Power of Attorney dated 06.03.2026 executed in Malaysia in favour of the petitioner. It is further submitted that despite the explicit directions passed by this Court for the purpose of adjudicating the Power of Attorney executed abroad, the request was rejected, resulting in the issuance of the impugned order dated 30.04.2026. Challenging the same, the petitioner has approached this Court. 3. Per contra, the learned Government Counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that though this Writ Petition was filed on 01.06.2026, the order adjudicating the Power of Attorney was subsequently passed on 10.06.2026. He further submitted that the appropriate stamp duty has been quantified and duly paid by the petitioner. It is also submitted that as and when any subsequent document is presented by the petitioner, the same will be considered and registered in accordance with law. __________ Page3 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 21230 of 2026

4. Such being the position, no further orders are required in the present Writ Petition since the primary grievance of the petitioner stands redressed by the respondents' adjudication of the Power of Attorney. Recording the submissions made by the learned Government Counsel, this Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 17-07-2026 Asi To 1. The Inspector General of Registration No 100, Santhome High Road, Chennai 600 028 2. The District Registrar Chennai South, Chennai 600 015 3. The Sub Registrar Office of Sub Registrar, Neelankarai, Chennai 600 115 __________ Page4 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 21230 of 2026 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. Asi WP No. 21230 of 2026 17-07-2026 __________ Page5 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

WP No. 21230 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 21230 of 2026 Arun Bhaskar S/o S.V. bhaskar, 7B Solomon Street Extension, East Tambaram, Kancheepuram 600 059 ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Inspector General of Registration No 100, Santhome High Road, Chennai 600 028 2. The District Registrar Chennai South, Chennai 600 015 3. The Sub Registrar Office of Sub Registrar, Neelankarai, Chennai 600 115 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the 3rd respondent culminating in Speaking order No 91/ 2026 dated 30.04.2026 and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law, and passed __________ Page1 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 21230 of 2026

in violation of this Honble Court direction dated 15.04.2026 and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to adjudicate the General Power of Attorney dated 06.03.2026 executed at Malaysia by the Principals Mrs. Saraswathy and Mr. Sivanesh in favour of the Petitioner in accordance with the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 without insisting upon the production of the original parent document (Sale Deed dated 03.08.1979 registered as Document No. 1221 of 1979) and Legal Heirship Certificates / Letters of Administration, and further consequently direct the 3rd respondent to accept and register the sale deed to be presented by executed by the petitioner based on the aforesaid adjudicated General power of Attorney. For Petitioner(s): Mr. Akshay Raam For Respondent(s): Mr. M. Roshan Atiq Government Counsel ORDER The present Writ Petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 30.04.2026, whereby the 3rd respondent refused to adjudicate the General Power of Attorney dated 06.03.2026. __________ Page2 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 21230 of 2026

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner had earlier filed a Writ Petition in W.P. No. 14135 of 2026 seeking a direction to the 2nd respondent to adjudicate the said General Power of Attorney. This Court, by an order dated 15.04.2026, directed the 3rd respondent to adjudicate the General Power of Attorney dated 06.03.2026 executed in Malaysia in favour of the petitioner. It is further submitted that despite the explicit directions passed by this Court for the purpose of adjudicating the Power of Attorney executed abroad, the request was rejected, resulting in the issuance of the impugned order dated 30.04.2026. Challenging the same, the petitioner has approached this Court. 3. Per contra, the learned Government Counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that though this Writ Petition was filed on 01.06.2026, the order adjudicating the Power of Attorney was subsequently passed on 10.06.2026. He further submitted that the appropriate stamp duty has been quantified and duly paid by the petitioner. It is also submitted that as and when any subsequent document is presented by the petitioner, the same will be considered and registered in accordance with law. __________ Page3 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 21230 of 2026

4. Such being the position, no further orders are required in the present Writ Petition since the primary grievance of the petitioner stands redressed by the respondents' adjudication of the Power of Attorney. Recording the submissions made by the learned Government Counsel, this Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 17-07-2026 Asi To 1. The Inspector General of Registration No 100, Santhome High Road, Chennai 600 028 2. The District Registrar Chennai South, Chennai 600 015 3. The Sub Registrar Office of Sub Registrar, Neelankarai, Chennai 600 115 __________ Page4 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 21230 of 2026 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. Asi WP No. 21230 of 2026 17-07-2026 __________ Page5 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis