WP No. 27124 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 15-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 27124 of 2026 S.Malar ..Petitioner(s) Vs The Tahsildar, Avadi Taluk, Avadi, Tiruvallur District. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to issue patta in the petitioner’s name for house situated in Old S.No.545, New R.S.No.545/2,Ward No.D, Block No.113(88), to an extent of 750 sq.meter, Avadi Municipal corporation limit, Thirumullaivoyal village, Chennai-600 062. For Petitioner(s): Mr.C.Prakasam For Respondent(s): Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, Government’s Counsel ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 17.03.2026. __________ Page1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 27124 of 2026 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has made a representation dated 17.03.2026 before the respondent seeking issuance of patta in respect of subject land, since an assignment patta was issued in favour of petitioner’s father. However, the said representation was not considered, as on date. Hence, this writ petition.

3. Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, learned Government’s Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent and submitted that upon verification, it has come to light that the aforesaid assignment patta issued in favour of the petitioner’s father is bogus. Accordingly, he prays for appropriate orders. 4. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record. 5. According to the Government Counsel, the assignment patta issued in favour of the petitioner’s father is bogus; hence, they are not in a position to issue a patta in respect of the subject land. Such being the case, this Court directs the respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 17.03.2026 by issuing due notice to the petitioner and any other aggrieved parties, if any and to pass a speaking order within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. This will enable the petitioner to __________ Page2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 27124 of 2026 approach the appropriate forum in the event that they are aggrieved by the said speaking order. 6. With the above direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. 15-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No VM To: The Tahsildar, Avadi Taluk, Avadi, Tiruvallur District. __________ Page3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 27124 of 2026 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. VM WP No. 27124 of 2026 15-07-2026 __________ Page4 of 4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

WP No. 27124 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 15-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 27124 of 2026 S.Malar ..Petitioner(s) Vs The Tahsildar, Avadi Taluk, Avadi, Tiruvallur District. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to issue patta in the petitioner’s name for house situated in Old S.No.545, New R.S.No.545/2,Ward No.D, Block No.113(88), to an extent of 750 sq.meter, Avadi Municipal corporation limit, Thirumullaivoyal village, Chennai-600 062. For Petitioner(s): Mr.C.Prakasam For Respondent(s): Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, Government’s Counsel ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 17.03.2026. __________ Page1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 27124 of 2026 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has made a representation dated 17.03.2026 before the respondent seeking issuance of patta in respect of subject land, since an assignment patta was issued in favour of petitioner’s father. However, the said representation was not considered, as on date. Hence, this writ petition.

3. Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, learned Government’s Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent and submitted that upon verification, it has come to light that the aforesaid assignment patta issued in favour of the petitioner’s father is bogus. Accordingly, he prays for appropriate orders. 4. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record. 5. According to the Government Counsel, the assignment patta issued in favour of the petitioner’s father is bogus; hence, they are not in a position to issue a patta in respect of the subject land. Such being the case, this Court directs the respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 17.03.2026 by issuing due notice to the petitioner and any other aggrieved parties, if any and to pass a speaking order within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. This will enable the petitioner to __________ Page2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 27124 of 2026 approach the appropriate forum in the event that they are aggrieved by the said speaking order. 6. With the above direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. 15-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No VM To: The Tahsildar, Avadi Taluk, Avadi, Tiruvallur District. __________ Page3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 27124 of 2026 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. VM WP No. 27124 of 2026 15-07-2026 __________ Page4 of 4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis