CRL OP No. 18155 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 18155 of 2026 B.Ajithkumar @ Van Ajith S/o.Baskar, No.2 E, Gandhi Nagar, Erikkarai Street, Sholinganallur, Chennai - 600 119. ..Petitioner(s) Vs State represented by The Inspector of Police T-16, Semmanchery Police Station, Chennai. Crime no.123 of 2026. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of BNSS, praying to enlarge the petitioner/A-1 on bail in the event of his arrest in connection with the case in Crime No.0123 of 2026 on the file of the Respondent Police. For Petitioner(s): M/S.K.M. Mohamedziauddin For Respondent(s): MS.R.S.INDIRA, GOVT.ADVOCATE (CRL.SIDE) __________ Page1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 18155 of 2026 ORDER The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offences under Section 309(6) of BNS 2023 in Crime No. 0123 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused robbed Rs.50,000/- cash and I Phone 15 from the defacto complainant and assaulted him. Hence the complaint. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and a false case has been foisted against the petitioner and that he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution.

4. Per contra, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution's case and submitted that this is a case of robbery. Only the stolen iPhone was recovered, while Rs. 50,000/- is yet to be recovered from the accused. As the petitioner is A1, the learned Government Advocate opposed the grant of anticipatory bail. __________ Page2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 18155 of 2026 5. I have given my anxious consideration to either side submissions. 6. Considering the fact that the stolen amount of Rs. 50,000/- is yet to be recovered, releasing the petitioner on bail at this stage would derail the prosecution case. Hence, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 7. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 13-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No MFA To 1.The Inspector of Police T-16, Semmanchery Police Station, Chennai. 2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Chennai. __________ Page3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 18155 of 2026 C.KUMARAPPAN, J MFA CRL OP No. 18155 of 2026 13-07-2026 __________ Page4 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

CRL OP No. 18155 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 18155 of 2026 B.Ajithkumar @ Van Ajith S/o.Baskar, No.2 E, Gandhi Nagar, Erikkarai Street, Sholinganallur, Chennai - 600 119. ..Petitioner(s) Vs State represented by The Inspector of Police T-16, Semmanchery Police Station, Chennai. Crime no.123 of 2026. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of BNSS, praying to enlarge the petitioner/A-1 on bail in the event of his arrest in connection with the case in Crime No.0123 of 2026 on the file of the Respondent Police. For Petitioner(s): M/S.K.M. Mohamedziauddin For Respondent(s): MS.R.S.INDIRA, GOVT.ADVOCATE (CRL.SIDE) __________ Page1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 18155 of 2026 ORDER The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offences under Section 309(6) of BNS 2023 in Crime No. 0123 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused robbed Rs.50,000/- cash and I Phone 15 from the defacto complainant and assaulted him. Hence the complaint. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and a false case has been foisted against the petitioner and that he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution.

4. Per contra, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution's case and submitted that this is a case of robbery. Only the stolen iPhone was recovered, while Rs. 50,000/- is yet to be recovered from the accused. As the petitioner is A1, the learned Government Advocate opposed the grant of anticipatory bail. __________ Page2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 18155 of 2026 5. I have given my anxious consideration to either side submissions. 6. Considering the fact that the stolen amount of Rs. 50,000/- is yet to be recovered, releasing the petitioner on bail at this stage would derail the prosecution case. Hence, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 7. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 13-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No MFA To 1.The Inspector of Police T-16, Semmanchery Police Station, Chennai. 2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Chennai. __________ Page3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 18155 of 2026 C.KUMARAPPAN, J MFA CRL OP No. 18155 of 2026 13-07-2026 __________ Page4 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis