Madras High Court
Sakthivel v. State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police
- Decision date
- 2026-07-06
- Text availability
- Full text
- Judges
- C. Kumarappan
Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗
Connected provisions and cases
No further provision or case links are recorded.
Judgment text
CRL.O.P.No. 17198 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06.07.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL.O.P.No.17198 of 2026 Sakthivel ..Petitioner(s) Vs State rep.by, The Inspector of Police, Denkanikottai Police Station, Krishnagiri District. Cr.No.161 of 2026 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of the arrest in Cr.No.161 of 2026 on the file of the respondent Police. For Petitioner(s): Mr.V.Sakkarapani For Respondent(s): Mr.N.Palanivel Government Advocate (Criminal side) O R D E R The petitioner, who apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Section 303(2) of BNS, and Section 21(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act, 1957, in Crime No.161 of 2026, on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail. __________ Page1 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL.O.P.No. 17198 of 2026 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with the other accused are alleged to have involved in illegal quarrying of stones by using the compressor vehicle along with generator. Hence, the case.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this Court and ready to co-operate for investigation. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and, opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5. I have given my anxious consideration to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record. 6.Though this Court views the offence of theft of natural resources and its exploitation as serious offence, upon the fond hope that he would mend himself in future and would not come under the adverse notice of the respondent, this Court is inclined to enlarge him on anticipatory bail, subject to certain conditions. __________ Page2 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL.O.P.No. 17198 of 2026
7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Denkanikottai, Krishnagiri, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, and on further conditions: (a) If the petitioner fails to surrender before the concerned learned Magistrate within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled; (b) The sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the application for surety ship (Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019]'. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of identify proofs to ensure their identity; (c) The petitioner is directed to make a non-refundable deposit of Rs.25,000/- [Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only] directly to the credit of “Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority, High Court Campus, Chennai”, without prejudice to the right of the defence before the Trial Court and the receipt shall be produced at the time of executing the bond; (d) The petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 am for a period of two weeks; thereafter as and when required; __________
Page3 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL.O.P.No. 17198 of 2026 (e) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate actions against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on anticipatory bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji v. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; (f) If the petitioner thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS Act. 06.07.2026 ssb To 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Denkanikottai, Krishnagiri. 2.The Inspector of Police, Denkanikottai Police Station, Krishnagiri District. 3.The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras. __________ Page4 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL.O.P.No. 17198 of 2026 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. ssb CRL OP No. 17198 of 2026 06.07.2026 __________ Page5 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis