Crl.O.P.No.17069 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 03.07.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Crl.O.P.No.17069 of 2026 1. Baskaran @ Deel Baskar 2. Prasanth ... Petitioner(s) Vs. The State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Vaniyambadi Town Police Station, Tirupattur District. ... Respondent(s) Crime No.207 of 2026 PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.207 of 2026 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner(s) : Mr.M.Ganesh For Respondent(s) : Mr.S.Yogaraj Sekar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 10.06.2026 for the alleged offences under Sections 310(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, in Crime No.207 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.17069 of 2026 2. It is the case of the prosecution that the petitioners were found in possession of a crowbar, a cutting blade and a screwdriver. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the petitioner has been in custody since 10.06.2026 and that, in any event, his further custody is not required for the purpose of investigation. Hence, he prayed for grant of bail.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police, while opposing the grant of bail, reiterated the prosecution case and, on instructions, submitted that the first petitioner has nine previous cases and the second petitioner has got twelve previous cases and that the investigation is still pending. It was further submitted that, if the petitioners are enlarged on bail, there is every possibility of his tampering with witnesses. 5. Considering the submission of the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) that the investigation is still pending, the past conduct of the petitioners, and having regard to the nature of the allegations, this Court is of the view that it would not be appropriate to grant bail to the petitioners at this stage. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.17069 of 2026 6. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 03.07.2026 skr To 1. The learned Judicial Magistrate, Vaniyambadi 2. The Superintendent, Sub Jail, Vaniyambadi 3. The Inspector of Police, Vaniyambadi Town Police Station, Tirupattur 4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.17069 of 2026 C.KUMARAPPAN,J. skr Crl.O.P.No.17069 of 2026 03.07.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.O.P.No.17069 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 03.07.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Crl.O.P.No.17069 of 2026 1. Baskaran @ Deel Baskar 2. Prasanth ... Petitioner(s) Vs. The State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Vaniyambadi Town Police Station, Tirupattur District. ... Respondent(s) Crime No.207 of 2026 PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.207 of 2026 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner(s) : Mr.M.Ganesh For Respondent(s) : Mr.S.Yogaraj Sekar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 10.06.2026 for the alleged offences under Sections 310(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, in Crime No.207 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.17069 of 2026 2. It is the case of the prosecution that the petitioners were found in possession of a crowbar, a cutting blade and a screwdriver. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the petitioner has been in custody since 10.06.2026 and that, in any event, his further custody is not required for the purpose of investigation. Hence, he prayed for grant of bail.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police, while opposing the grant of bail, reiterated the prosecution case and, on instructions, submitted that the first petitioner has nine previous cases and the second petitioner has got twelve previous cases and that the investigation is still pending. It was further submitted that, if the petitioners are enlarged on bail, there is every possibility of his tampering with witnesses. 5. Considering the submission of the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) that the investigation is still pending, the past conduct of the petitioners, and having regard to the nature of the allegations, this Court is of the view that it would not be appropriate to grant bail to the petitioners at this stage. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.17069 of 2026 6. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 03.07.2026 skr To 1. The learned Judicial Magistrate, Vaniyambadi 2. The Superintendent, Sub Jail, Vaniyambadi 3. The Inspector of Police, Vaniyambadi Town Police Station, Tirupattur 4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.17069 of 2026 C.KUMARAPPAN,J. skr Crl.O.P.No.17069 of 2026 03.07.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis