CMP.(MD)Nos.6405 & 6406 of 2025 in WA.(MD)SR.Nos.20269 & 20505 of 2025 C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J and R. SAKTHIVEL, J These petitions have been filed seeking to condone the delay of 160 days respectively in filing the Writ Appeals against the order dated 13.08.2024 made in W.P(MD)Nos.19381 & 19382 of 2024. 2.In the affidavit filed in support of this petition, it is stated that the petitioner is the third party to the writ petition and he was not aware of the orders passed and only when knowledge about the order of the learned Single Judge, steps had been taken by him. 3.Notice had been ordered and duly served. The learned counsel entered appearance on behalf of the first respondent and questioned 1/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis the locus of the petitioner herein to file the writ appeal. However, leave had been granted by the co-ordinate Division Bench, on 04.04.2025. 4.Taking the above stated facts into consideration, the delay stands condoned and these petitions are allowed. The Registry is directed to number the appeals if it are otherwise in order. When the appeals are listed for admission, the name of the learned counsel, who appeared for the first respondent, to be printed in the cause list. (C.V.K.,J) & (R.S.V.,J) 03.07.2026 gns 2/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J and R. SAKTHIVEL, J gns CMP.(MD)Nos.6405 & 6406 of 2025 in WA.(MD)SR.Nos.20269 & 20505 of 2025 03.07.2026 3/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

CMP.(MD)Nos.6405 & 6406 of 2025 in WA.(MD)SR.Nos.20269 & 20505 of 2025 C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J and R. SAKTHIVEL, J These petitions have been filed seeking to condone the delay of 160 days respectively in filing the Writ Appeals against the order dated 13.08.2024 made in W.P(MD)Nos.19381 & 19382 of 2024. 2.In the affidavit filed in support of this petition, it is stated that the petitioner is the third party to the writ petition and he was not aware of the orders passed and only when knowledge about the order of the learned Single Judge, steps had been taken by him. 3.Notice had been ordered and duly served. The learned counsel entered appearance on behalf of the first respondent and questioned 1/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis the locus of the petitioner herein to file the writ appeal. However, leave had been granted by the co-ordinate Division Bench, on 04.04.2025. 4.Taking the above stated facts into consideration, the delay stands condoned and these petitions are allowed. The Registry is directed to number the appeals if it are otherwise in order. When the appeals are listed for admission, the name of the learned counsel, who appeared for the first respondent, to be printed in the cause list. (C.V.K.,J) & (R.S.V.,J) 03.07.2026 gns 2/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J and R. SAKTHIVEL, J gns CMP.(MD)Nos.6405 & 6406 of 2025 in WA.(MD)SR.Nos.20269 & 20505 of 2025 03.07.2026 3/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis