Madras High Court
P.Kulanthai Nachiyar v. The Additional Director
WP(MD)/18220/2026
- Decision date
- 2026-07-02
- Text availability
- Full text
- Judges
- Mummineni Sudheer Kumar
Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗
Connected provisions and cases
No further provision or case links are recorded.
Judgment text
W.P.(MD) No.18220 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 02.07.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR W.P.(MD) No.18220 of 2026 P.Kulanthai Nachiyar ... Petitioner -vs- 1.The Additional Director Town Panchayat Tirunelveli Zone 2.The Commissioner Surandai Municipality Surandai, Tenkasi District 3.The Director Directorate of Local Fund Audit Nandanam, Chennai-600 035 ... Respondents [R3 is suo motu impleaded vide order dated 02.07.2026] PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of mandamus directing the third responident to pass order on the petitioner's application presented dated 04.06.2026 to revise and enhance the petitioner's family pension following the G.O.Ms.No.245, Finance (PGC-I) Department, dated 19.07.2018. For Petitioner : Mr.T.S.Mohamed Mohideen For Respondents : Mrs.K.Porkodi Counsel for the Government of Tamil Nadu ____________ Page 1 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.18220 of 2026 O R D E R Mrs.K.Porkodi, learned counsel for the Government of Tamil Nadu, takes notice for the respondents. 2. With the consent of both sides, this writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the Government of Tamil Nadu appearing for the respondents.
4. The petitioner herein, who is a family pensioner, having come to know about the orders issued by the Government in G.O.Ms.No.245, Finance (PGC-I) Department, dated 19.07.2018, claims to have submitted a representation / application dated 04.06.2026 to the respondents requesting for enhanced pension in terms of Paragraph No.12 of the said Government Order. As the respondents have not taken any action on the said representation, the petitioner has approached this Court by filing the present writ petition. ____________ Page 2 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.18220 of 2026 5. Considering the nature of the relief sought in this writ petition, this Court does not see any reason to invite counter-affidavit from the respondents. 6. Learned counsel for the Government of Tamil Nadu appearing for the respondents fairly submitted that the first respondent would consider the request made by the petitioner and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law.
7. In the light of the above submission of the learned counsel for the Government of Tamil Nadu, without going into the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to consider the representation / application dated 04.06.2026 submitted by the petitioner by duly taking into consideration the Government Order in G.O.Ms.No.245, Finance (PGC-I) Department, dated 19.07.2018, and pass appropriate orders thereon, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. 02.07.2026 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No krk ____________ Page 3 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.18220 of 2026 To: 1.The Additional Director, Town Panchayat, Tirunelveli Zone. 2.The Commissioner, Surandai Municipality, Surandai, Tenkasi District. 3.The Director, Directorate of Local Fund Audit, Nandanam, Chennai-600 035. ____________ Page 4 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.18220 of 2026 MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J. krk W.P.(MD) No.18220 of 2026 02.07.2026 ____________ Page 5 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis