WMP(MD). No.10186 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 29/06/2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. SAKTHIVEL WMP(MD). No.10186 of 2026 in Rev.APLW(MD)SR.No.11119 of 2023 1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by the Secretary, Agriculture (AAI) Department, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009. 2. The Director of Agriculture, Directorate of Agriculture, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005. 3. The District Collector, Collectorate, Nagercoil, Kanniyakumari District. 4. The Joint/Deputy Director of Agriculture, Collectorate Adjacent Building, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari – 629 001. 5. The Tahsildar, Vilavancode Taluk, Kanyakumari District. ... Review Petitioners/Respondents Vs. A.Vins Anto ... Respondent/writ petitioner 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WMP(MD). No.10186 of 2026 PRAYER:- This petition is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone the delay of 143 days in filing the above Review Application against the order dated 27.07.2022 made in WP (MD) No.957 of 2019. For Petitioners : Mr.B.Saravanan Additional Advocate General Assisted by Mr.M.P.Senthil Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu For Respondent : Mr.C.T.Perumal ORDER (Order of the Court was made by C.V.Karthikeyan, J.) This writ miscellaneous petition is filed seeking to condone the delay of 143 days in filing the review application against the order dated 27.07.2022 in WP(MD)No.957 of 2019.

2. Notice had been directed and the learned counsel, who has filed the writ petition, had entered appearance on behalf of the contesting respondent. 3. It is contended on behalf of the petitioners that necessary steps had been taken and only after examining all the issues, order had been passed. It is further contended that there are further contentions to be argued in the review. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WMP(MD). No.10186 of 2026 4. But however, to the limited extent of the delay aspect, this petition stands allowed. The Registry is directed to number the review application, if it is otherwise in order. When the review application comes up for admission, the name of the learned counsel for the respondent may be printed in the cause list. (C.V.K., J) & (R.S.V., J) 29.06.2026 CM 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WMP(MD). No.10186 of 2026 C.V.KARTHIKEYAN,J and R.SAKTHIVEL.,J. CM WMP(MD). No.10186 of 2026 in Rev.APLW(MD)SR.No.11119 of 2023 Date : 29/06/2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

WMP(MD). No.10186 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 29/06/2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. SAKTHIVEL WMP(MD). No.10186 of 2026 in Rev.APLW(MD)SR.No.11119 of 2023 1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by the Secretary, Agriculture (AAI) Department, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009. 2. The Director of Agriculture, Directorate of Agriculture, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005. 3. The District Collector, Collectorate, Nagercoil, Kanniyakumari District. 4. The Joint/Deputy Director of Agriculture, Collectorate Adjacent Building, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari – 629 001. 5. The Tahsildar, Vilavancode Taluk, Kanyakumari District. ... Review Petitioners/Respondents Vs. A.Vins Anto ... Respondent/writ petitioner 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WMP(MD). No.10186 of 2026 PRAYER:- This petition is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone the delay of 143 days in filing the above Review Application against the order dated 27.07.2022 made in WP (MD) No.957 of 2019. For Petitioners : Mr.B.Saravanan Additional Advocate General Assisted by Mr.M.P.Senthil Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu For Respondent : Mr.C.T.Perumal ORDER (Order of the Court was made by C.V.Karthikeyan, J.) This writ miscellaneous petition is filed seeking to condone the delay of 143 days in filing the review application against the order dated 27.07.2022 in WP(MD)No.957 of 2019.

2. Notice had been directed and the learned counsel, who has filed the writ petition, had entered appearance on behalf of the contesting respondent. 3. It is contended on behalf of the petitioners that necessary steps had been taken and only after examining all the issues, order had been passed. It is further contended that there are further contentions to be argued in the review. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WMP(MD). No.10186 of 2026 4. But however, to the limited extent of the delay aspect, this petition stands allowed. The Registry is directed to number the review application, if it is otherwise in order. When the review application comes up for admission, the name of the learned counsel for the respondent may be printed in the cause list. (C.V.K., J) & (R.S.V., J) 29.06.2026 CM 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WMP(MD). No.10186 of 2026 C.V.KARTHIKEYAN,J and R.SAKTHIVEL.,J. CM WMP(MD). No.10186 of 2026 in Rev.APLW(MD)SR.No.11119 of 2023 Date : 29/06/2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis