2026:MHC:2282 HCP No. 2446 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 24-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN HCP No. 2446 of 2025 Chinnaponnu ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Secretary to the Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009. 2. The Commissioner of Police, Salem City. 3. The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison, Salem - 7. 4. The Inspector of Police, Steel Plant Police Station, Salem City. ..Respondent(s) Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Habeas Corpus, calling for the records in connection with the order of detention passed by the second respondent dated 16.10.2025 in C.M.P.No.74/Goonda/Salem City/2025 against the petitioner Son Anbalagan, Male aged 21 years, S/o.Rajendiran, who is confined at Central Prison, Salem and set aside the same and direct the __________ Page 1 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2026:MHC:2282 HCP No. 2446 of 2025 respondents to produce the detenu before the Court and set him at liberty. For Petitioner(s): Mr.P.Raman For Respondent(s): Mr.C.R.Malarvannan Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side) ORDER (Order of the Court was made by Sunder Mohan J.)

The mother of the detenu – Anbalagan, S/o.Rajendran, aged 21 years, has filed this petition challenging the detention order dated 16.10.2025, branding him as ‘Goonda’ under Section 2(f) of the Tamil Nadu Preventive Detention Act, 1982 (Act 14/1982). 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side) for the respondents. 3. Though several grounds have been raised, we are of the view that the detention order is liable to be quashed on the ground that the satisfaction of the detaining authority as regards the real possibility of the detenu coming out on bail suffers from non-application of mind. __________ Page 2 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2026:MHC:2282 HCP No. 2446 of 2025 4. The detaining authority has relied upon a statement said to have been made by the mother of the detenu/the petitioner herein, under Section 180(3) of the BNSS that she is taking steps to file a bail application in the ground case. However, we find that the statement of the mother of the detenu/petitioner herein is neither signed nor dated.

5. On 03.03.2026, in HCP Nos. 2129, 2179 and 2340 of 2025, we had held that the unsigned statement cannot be relied upon to infer that the detenu is likely to file bail application. We had reiterated and clarified this view in a subsequent case, i.e., HCP No.2356 of 2025 dated .22.06.2026, after we were informed that our view was held to be per incuriam by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in HCP (MD) N0.369 of 2026 dated 19.06.2026. We have held that only a signed statement of a relative can be relied upon by the detaining authority to satisfy himself as regards the possibility of the detenu filing a bail application and that a Section 180(3) of BNSS statement cannot be the basis for such a satisfaction. __________ Page 3 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2026:MHC:2282 HCP No. 2446 of 2025 6. Therefore, the reliance placed on the said statement recorded under Section 180(3) of BNSS, by the detaining authority to arrive at the satisfaction that there is a real possibility of the detenu coming out on bail is misconceived. Thus, the inference that the detention is warranted since the detenu is likely to indulge in further criminal activities after his release on bail is based on the said wrong premise. Hence, the detention order is liable to be quashed. 7. In light of the aforesaid discussion, this Habeas Corpus Petition is allowed and the Detention Order passed by the second respondent in C.M.P.No.74/Goonda/Salem City/2025 dated 16.10.2025 is set aside.

8. The detenu, viz., Anbalagan, S/o.Rajendran, aged 21 years, who is now confined in Central Prison, Salem, is hereby directed to be set at liberty forthwith unless his presence is required in connection with any other case. (A.S.M.,J.) (S.M.,J.) 24-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No TSG Note: Issue Order copy today. __________ Page 4 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2026:MHC:2282 HCP No. 2446 of 2025 To 1. The Secretary to the Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009. 2. The Commissioner of Police, Salem City. 3. The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison, Salem - 7. 4. The Inspector of Police, Steel Plant Police Station, Salem City. 5. The Joint Secretary, Law and Order Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009. 6. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. __________ Page 5 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2026:MHC:2282 HCP No. 2446 of 2025 DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J. AND SUNDER MOHAN, J. Tsg HCP No. 2446 of 2025 24-06-2026 __________ Page 6 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

2026:MHC:2282 HCP No. 2446 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 24-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN HCP No. 2446 of 2025 Chinnaponnu ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Secretary to the Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009. 2. The Commissioner of Police, Salem City. 3. The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison, Salem - 7. 4. The Inspector of Police, Steel Plant Police Station, Salem City. ..Respondent(s) Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Habeas Corpus, calling for the records in connection with the order of detention passed by the second respondent dated 16.10.2025 in C.M.P.No.74/Goonda/Salem City/2025 against the petitioner Son Anbalagan, Male aged 21 years, S/o.Rajendiran, who is confined at Central Prison, Salem and set aside the same and direct the __________ Page 1 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2026:MHC:2282 HCP No. 2446 of 2025 respondents to produce the detenu before the Court and set him at liberty. For Petitioner(s): Mr.P.Raman For Respondent(s): Mr.C.R.Malarvannan Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side) ORDER (Order of the Court was made by Sunder Mohan J.)

The mother of the detenu – Anbalagan, S/o.Rajendran, aged 21 years, has filed this petition challenging the detention order dated 16.10.2025, branding him as ‘Goonda’ under Section 2(f) of the Tamil Nadu Preventive Detention Act, 1982 (Act 14/1982). 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side) for the respondents. 3. Though several grounds have been raised, we are of the view that the detention order is liable to be quashed on the ground that the satisfaction of the detaining authority as regards the real possibility of the detenu coming out on bail suffers from non-application of mind. __________ Page 2 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2026:MHC:2282 HCP No. 2446 of 2025 4. The detaining authority has relied upon a statement said to have been made by the mother of the detenu/the petitioner herein, under Section 180(3) of the BNSS that she is taking steps to file a bail application in the ground case. However, we find that the statement of the mother of the detenu/petitioner herein is neither signed nor dated.

5. On 03.03.2026, in HCP Nos. 2129, 2179 and 2340 of 2025, we had held that the unsigned statement cannot be relied upon to infer that the detenu is likely to file bail application. We had reiterated and clarified this view in a subsequent case, i.e., HCP No.2356 of 2025 dated .22.06.2026, after we were informed that our view was held to be per incuriam by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in HCP (MD) N0.369 of 2026 dated 19.06.2026. We have held that only a signed statement of a relative can be relied upon by the detaining authority to satisfy himself as regards the possibility of the detenu filing a bail application and that a Section 180(3) of BNSS statement cannot be the basis for such a satisfaction. __________ Page 3 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2026:MHC:2282 HCP No. 2446 of 2025 6. Therefore, the reliance placed on the said statement recorded under Section 180(3) of BNSS, by the detaining authority to arrive at the satisfaction that there is a real possibility of the detenu coming out on bail is misconceived. Thus, the inference that the detention is warranted since the detenu is likely to indulge in further criminal activities after his release on bail is based on the said wrong premise. Hence, the detention order is liable to be quashed. 7. In light of the aforesaid discussion, this Habeas Corpus Petition is allowed and the Detention Order passed by the second respondent in C.M.P.No.74/Goonda/Salem City/2025 dated 16.10.2025 is set aside.

8. The detenu, viz., Anbalagan, S/o.Rajendran, aged 21 years, who is now confined in Central Prison, Salem, is hereby directed to be set at liberty forthwith unless his presence is required in connection with any other case. (A.S.M.,J.) (S.M.,J.) 24-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No TSG Note: Issue Order copy today. __________ Page 4 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2026:MHC:2282 HCP No. 2446 of 2025 To 1. The Secretary to the Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009. 2. The Commissioner of Police, Salem City. 3. The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison, Salem - 7. 4. The Inspector of Police, Steel Plant Police Station, Salem City. 5. The Joint Secretary, Law and Order Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009. 6. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. __________ Page 5 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2026:MHC:2282 HCP No. 2446 of 2025 DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J. AND SUNDER MOHAN, J. Tsg HCP No. 2446 of 2025 24-06-2026 __________ Page 6 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis