Madras High Court
Mrs.b.sathya Kala v. The District Collector
WP/23856/2026
- Decision date
- 2026-06-23
- Text availability
- Full text
- Judges
- Krishnan Ramasamy
Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗
Connected provisions and cases
No further provision or case links are recorded.
Judgment text
WP No. 23856 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 23-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 23856 of 2026 B.Sathya Kala ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector, chengalpattu district, chengalpattu – 603001. 2. The Tahsildar, Taluk office, pallavaram taluk, pammal, chennai - 600075. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to issue patta to the property situated at plot no.7 having an extent of 7525 square feet, comprised in survey No.122, situated at old No.100 and 88, New no.23, Pammal Village, in Pallavaram Taluk, Chennai to the petitioner herein and pass orders on the representation dated 23.01.2026 filed by the petitioner for issuing the patta in her favour. For Petitioner(s): Mr.G.Mutharasu For Respondent(s): Mr.M.Guruprasad, Govt., Counsel ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 23.01.2026. __________ Page1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 23856 of 2026
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has made a representation dated 23.01.2026 before the respondents, seeking issuance of patta on her favour in respect of the property situated at plot No.7 having an extent of 7525 square feet, comprised in survey No.122, situated at old No.100 and 88, New No.23, Pammal Village, in Pallavaram Taluk, Chennai. However, the said representation was not considered, as on date. Hence, this writ petition. 3. Mr.M.Guruprasad, learned Government’s Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and submitted that the petitioner’s representation dated 23.01.2026 will be considered within a period of six weeks. 4. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record. 5. Considering the limited relief sought by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, directs the second respondent to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 23.01.2026, after issuing due notice to the petitioner and other aggrieved persons, if any, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. __________ Page2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 23856 of 2026 6. With the above direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. 23-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No VM To:
1. The District Collector, chengalpattu district, chengalpattu – 603001. 2. The Tahsildar, Taluk office, pallavaram taluk, pammal, chennai - 600075. __________ Page3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 23856 of 2026 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. VM WP No. 23856 of 2026 23-06-2026 __________ Page4 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis