CRL OP(MD). No. 9452 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 23.06.2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL CRL OP(MD). No. 9452 of 2026 Rajandaran ...Petitioner/Accused Vs State of Tamil Nadu rep. by The Inspector of Police, Ulagampatti Police Station Sivagangai. (Crime No. 15 of 2026 ) ...Respondent For Petitioner : Mr.M.Pitchai Muthu Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.N.Balasubramanian Counsel for State of TN (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Cr.No. 15 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :-1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No. 9452 of 2026 The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent for the offences punishable under Sections 118(1), 296(b), 324(4) and 351(3) of BNS, 2023 in Crime No. 15 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that on 01.05.2026, when the defacto complainant was standing near the petitioner, the petitioner had some citrate, due to which wordy quarrel arose and the petitioner assaulted the defacto complainant and assaulted him in filthy language. Hence, the case.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and he was falsely implicated in this case and he is no way connected in the above said incident. He has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Hence, he prayed to grant Anticipatory Bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Counsel for State of TN (Crl.Side) would submit 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No. 9452 of 2026 that based on the complaint given by the defacto complainant, a case has been registered for the offences punishable under Sections 118(1), 296(b), 324(4) and 351(3) of BNS, 2023 in Crime No. 15 of 2026. He would further submit that injured was discharged from the hospital and the petitioner has one previous case. He would further submit that the investigation is pending and the offences are grave in nature and hence, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record. 6. Considering the rival submissions made on either side and the nature of offences charged against the petitioner, and considering the facts that injured was discharged from the hospital and though the petitioner has one previous case, in that case the petitioner was granted bail, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions: [a] Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his/her appearance, within a 3/6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No. 9452 of 2026 period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Singampunari, Sivagangai, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate concerned and on further conditions that: [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police, daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders; [c] the petitioner shall not commit any offences of similar nature. [d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial. [e] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No. 9452 of 2026 released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S. (P D B J) 23.06.2026 apd To 1.The District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Singampunari, Sivagangai.

2.The Inspector of Police, Ulagampatti Police Station Sivagangai. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No. 9452 of 2026 P. DHANABAL, J apd ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No. 9452 of 2026 Date : 23.06.2026 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

CRL OP(MD). No. 9452 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 23.06.2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL CRL OP(MD). No. 9452 of 2026 Rajandaran ...Petitioner/Accused Vs State of Tamil Nadu rep. by The Inspector of Police, Ulagampatti Police Station Sivagangai. (Crime No. 15 of 2026 ) ...Respondent For Petitioner : Mr.M.Pitchai Muthu Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.N.Balasubramanian Counsel for State of TN (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Cr.No. 15 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :-1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No. 9452 of 2026 The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent for the offences punishable under Sections 118(1), 296(b), 324(4) and 351(3) of BNS, 2023 in Crime No. 15 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that on 01.05.2026, when the defacto complainant was standing near the petitioner, the petitioner had some citrate, due to which wordy quarrel arose and the petitioner assaulted the defacto complainant and assaulted him in filthy language. Hence, the case.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and he was falsely implicated in this case and he is no way connected in the above said incident. He has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Hence, he prayed to grant Anticipatory Bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Counsel for State of TN (Crl.Side) would submit 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No. 9452 of 2026 that based on the complaint given by the defacto complainant, a case has been registered for the offences punishable under Sections 118(1), 296(b), 324(4) and 351(3) of BNS, 2023 in Crime No. 15 of 2026. He would further submit that injured was discharged from the hospital and the petitioner has one previous case. He would further submit that the investigation is pending and the offences are grave in nature and hence, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record. 6. Considering the rival submissions made on either side and the nature of offences charged against the petitioner, and considering the facts that injured was discharged from the hospital and though the petitioner has one previous case, in that case the petitioner was granted bail, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions: [a] Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his/her appearance, within a 3/6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No. 9452 of 2026 period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Singampunari, Sivagangai, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate concerned and on further conditions that: [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police, daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders; [c] the petitioner shall not commit any offences of similar nature. [d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial. [e] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No. 9452 of 2026 released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S. (P D B J) 23.06.2026 apd To 1.The District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Singampunari, Sivagangai.

2.The Inspector of Police, Ulagampatti Police Station Sivagangai. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No. 9452 of 2026 P. DHANABAL, J apd ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No. 9452 of 2026 Date : 23.06.2026 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis