Crl.O.P.(MD)No.11608 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 19.06.2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL CRL OP(MD). No. 11608 of 2026 1.Sathiyabooma 2.Menaga ... Petitioners Vs State of Tamil Nadu rep. by The Inspector of Police, Thiruppullani Police Station, Ramanathapuram District. (Crime No.124 of 2026) ...Respondents/Complainant For Petitioners : Mr.M.Boopathipandiyan Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.N.Balasubramanian Counsel for State of TN (Crl. side) For Intervenor : Ms.A.Banumathy PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Cr.No. 124 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :-1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.11608 of 2026 The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent for the offences punishable under Sections 286(b), 324(4), 329(4) and 351(3) of BNS, in Crime No.124 of 2026, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.When the matter is taken up for hearing the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that the offences involved in this case are bailable offences. Therefore, there is no question of granting anticipatory bail by this Court.

3.This Court also perused the records. As per the FIR the the case was registered for the offences punishable under Sections 286(b), 324(4), 329(4) and 351(3) of BNS. All the above said offences are bailable in nature. Therefore, there is no question of granting anticipatory bail by this Court. 4.In the meantime, the learned counsel Ms.A.Banumathy, submitted that she is going to file intervening application. Since so far she has not filed any application and the offences are bailable in nature, her request is rejected. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.11608 of 2026 5.Accordingly, this petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioners to approach the appropriate forum in accordance with law. (P D B J) 19.06.2026 TM To 1.The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Ramanathapuram. 2.The Inspector of Police, Thiruppullani Police Station, Ramanathapuram District. (Crime No.124 of 2026) 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.11608 of 2026 P. DHANABAL, J. TM ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No. 11608 of 2026 Date : 19.06.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.11608 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 19.06.2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL CRL OP(MD). No. 11608 of 2026 1.Sathiyabooma 2.Menaga ... Petitioners Vs State of Tamil Nadu rep. by The Inspector of Police, Thiruppullani Police Station, Ramanathapuram District. (Crime No.124 of 2026) ...Respondents/Complainant For Petitioners : Mr.M.Boopathipandiyan Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.N.Balasubramanian Counsel for State of TN (Crl. side) For Intervenor : Ms.A.Banumathy PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Cr.No. 124 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :-1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.11608 of 2026 The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent for the offences punishable under Sections 286(b), 324(4), 329(4) and 351(3) of BNS, in Crime No.124 of 2026, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.When the matter is taken up for hearing the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that the offences involved in this case are bailable offences. Therefore, there is no question of granting anticipatory bail by this Court.

3.This Court also perused the records. As per the FIR the the case was registered for the offences punishable under Sections 286(b), 324(4), 329(4) and 351(3) of BNS. All the above said offences are bailable in nature. Therefore, there is no question of granting anticipatory bail by this Court. 4.In the meantime, the learned counsel Ms.A.Banumathy, submitted that she is going to file intervening application. Since so far she has not filed any application and the offences are bailable in nature, her request is rejected. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.11608 of 2026 5.Accordingly, this petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioners to approach the appropriate forum in accordance with law. (P D B J) 19.06.2026 TM To 1.The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Ramanathapuram. 2.The Inspector of Police, Thiruppullani Police Station, Ramanathapuram District. (Crime No.124 of 2026) 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.11608 of 2026 P. DHANABAL, J. TM ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No. 11608 of 2026 Date : 19.06.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis