Crl.O.P.(MD)No.11405 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 17.06.2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL CRL OP(MD). No. 11405 of 2026 G.Suman ...Petitioner Vs State of Tamil Nadu rep. by The Inspector of Police, Panagudi Police Station, Tirunelveli District. (Crime No.819 of 2026) ...Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.S.Suresh Manickam Advocate For Respondent : Mr.G.Ganesh Kumar Government Advocate (Crl. Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Bail in Cr.No. 819 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :-The petitioner / Accused, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 03.06.2026, for the offences punishable under Section 123 of BNS and Section 24(1) of Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Prohibition of 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.11405 of 2026 Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Commerce Production Supply and Distribution Act, in Crime No.819 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that on 03.06.2026, when the respondent police on the patrol duty, they found the petitioner along with other accused persons is in possession of banned tobacco products illegally. Hence, the case.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and he was falsely implicated in this case and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Only for statistical purpose this case has been foisted against him. Hence, he prayed bail for the petitioner. 4. The learned Government Advocate (crl. Side) appearing for the respondent would submit that the offence are grave in nature. The petitioner along with other accused persons is in possession of banned tobacco products. The petitioner has 3 previous cases. Investigation in this case is still pending. Hence, he opposed the grant of bail to the petitioner. 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.11405 of 2026 5. This Court heard both sides and perused the materials available on record. 6. Considering the rival submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, considering the nature of charges levelled against the petitioner, considering the quantity involved in this case, though the prosecution has stated that the petitioner has 3 previous cases, all are not similar in nature and in all those cases, already he was granted bail and considering the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions:

[a] Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Valliyoor, and on further conditions that: [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police, daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of thirty days, thereafter as and when required for interrogation: [c] the petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he/she is accused, or suspected, or of the 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.11405 of 2026 commission of which he/she is suspected; [d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [e] the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; [f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 BNS. (P D B J) 17.06.2026 TM To 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Valliyoor. 2.The Inspector of Police, Panagudi Police Station, Tirunelveli District. (Crime No.819 of 2026) 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.11405 of 2026 3.The Superintendent, Central Prison, Palayamkottai. 4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.11405 of 2026 P. DHANABAL, J. TM ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No. 11405 of 2026 Date : 17.06.2026 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.11405 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 17.06.2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL CRL OP(MD). No. 11405 of 2026 G.Suman ...Petitioner Vs State of Tamil Nadu rep. by The Inspector of Police, Panagudi Police Station, Tirunelveli District. (Crime No.819 of 2026) ...Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.S.Suresh Manickam Advocate For Respondent : Mr.G.Ganesh Kumar Government Advocate (Crl. Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Bail in Cr.No. 819 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :-The petitioner / Accused, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 03.06.2026, for the offences punishable under Section 123 of BNS and Section 24(1) of Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Prohibition of 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.11405 of 2026 Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Commerce Production Supply and Distribution Act, in Crime No.819 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that on 03.06.2026, when the respondent police on the patrol duty, they found the petitioner along with other accused persons is in possession of banned tobacco products illegally. Hence, the case.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and he was falsely implicated in this case and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Only for statistical purpose this case has been foisted against him. Hence, he prayed bail for the petitioner. 4. The learned Government Advocate (crl. Side) appearing for the respondent would submit that the offence are grave in nature. The petitioner along with other accused persons is in possession of banned tobacco products. The petitioner has 3 previous cases. Investigation in this case is still pending. Hence, he opposed the grant of bail to the petitioner. 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.11405 of 2026 5. This Court heard both sides and perused the materials available on record. 6. Considering the rival submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, considering the nature of charges levelled against the petitioner, considering the quantity involved in this case, though the prosecution has stated that the petitioner has 3 previous cases, all are not similar in nature and in all those cases, already he was granted bail and considering the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions:

[a] Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Valliyoor, and on further conditions that: [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police, daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of thirty days, thereafter as and when required for interrogation: [c] the petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he/she is accused, or suspected, or of the 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.11405 of 2026 commission of which he/she is suspected; [d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [e] the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; [f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 BNS. (P D B J) 17.06.2026 TM To 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Valliyoor. 2.The Inspector of Police, Panagudi Police Station, Tirunelveli District. (Crime No.819 of 2026) 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.11405 of 2026 3.The Superintendent, Central Prison, Palayamkottai. 4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.11405 of 2026 P. DHANABAL, J. TM ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No. 11405 of 2026 Date : 17.06.2026 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis