WP No. 21580 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP No. 21580 of 2026 and W.M.P.Nos.23365 & 23366 of 2026 Tvl.Karthik Agencies Rep. by its Proprietor M. Karthik No. 141, Sathy Road, Visuvasapuram, Saravanampatti, Coimbatore 641035 ..Petitioner(s) Vs The Deputy State Tax Officer 1 Saravanampatti East Circle, Coimbatore-641 018 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the Respondent vide his proceedings in GSTIN 33DNJPK8952E1ZS/ 2021-2022 dated 09.12.2025 and quash the same as it is illegal, without jurisdiction and in gross violation of Principles of Natural Justice and further direct the Respondent to re-do the assessment afresh after providing an opportunity of Personal Hearing as per the provisions of the GST Act, 2017. __________ Page1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 21580 of 2026 For Petitioner(s): Mr.P.Arumugam For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Sethu Prabakaran, Government Counsel (Tax) *********** ORDER An order dated 09.12.2025 is assailed on the ground that the petitioner did not have a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits. 2. Mr.R.Sethu Prabakaran, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of the respondent.

3. On perusal of the impugned order, it is evident that such order was issued without hearing the petitioner. The writ petition has been filed shortly after the period of limitation expired. 4. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to remit 25% of the disputed tax demand as a condition for remand. An endorsement to that effect has been made on the bundle. 5. Subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 25% of the disputed tax demand within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, __________ Page2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 21580 of 2026 the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded for re-consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within three months from the date of remittance of 25% of the disputed tax demand. 6. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected writ miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 16-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No RNA To The Deputy State Tax Officer 1 Saravanampatti East Circle, Coimbatore-641 018 __________ Page3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 21580 of 2026 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. RNA WP No. 21580 of 2026 and W.M.P.Nos.23365 & 23366 of 2026 16-06-2026 __________ Page4 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

WP No. 21580 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP No. 21580 of 2026 and W.M.P.Nos.23365 & 23366 of 2026 Tvl.Karthik Agencies Rep. by its Proprietor M. Karthik No. 141, Sathy Road, Visuvasapuram, Saravanampatti, Coimbatore 641035 ..Petitioner(s) Vs The Deputy State Tax Officer 1 Saravanampatti East Circle, Coimbatore-641 018 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the Respondent vide his proceedings in GSTIN 33DNJPK8952E1ZS/ 2021-2022 dated 09.12.2025 and quash the same as it is illegal, without jurisdiction and in gross violation of Principles of Natural Justice and further direct the Respondent to re-do the assessment afresh after providing an opportunity of Personal Hearing as per the provisions of the GST Act, 2017. __________ Page1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 21580 of 2026 For Petitioner(s): Mr.P.Arumugam For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Sethu Prabakaran, Government Counsel (Tax) *********** ORDER An order dated 09.12.2025 is assailed on the ground that the petitioner did not have a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits. 2. Mr.R.Sethu Prabakaran, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of the respondent.

3. On perusal of the impugned order, it is evident that such order was issued without hearing the petitioner. The writ petition has been filed shortly after the period of limitation expired. 4. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to remit 25% of the disputed tax demand as a condition for remand. An endorsement to that effect has been made on the bundle. 5. Subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 25% of the disputed tax demand within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, __________ Page2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 21580 of 2026 the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded for re-consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within three months from the date of remittance of 25% of the disputed tax demand. 6. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected writ miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 16-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No RNA To The Deputy State Tax Officer 1 Saravanampatti East Circle, Coimbatore-641 018 __________ Page3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 21580 of 2026 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. RNA WP No. 21580 of 2026 and W.M.P.Nos.23365 & 23366 of 2026 16-06-2026 __________ Page4 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis