Madras High Court

Saraswathi (Died) 1.sankaraappa Naicker v. Rajeswari

CMP(MD)/6538/2022

Decision date: 2026-06-15
Text availability: Full text
Judges: V. Lakshminarayanan

Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗

Connected provisions and cases

No further provision or case links are recorded.

Judgment text

C.M.P.(MD)No.6538 of 2022 C.M.P.(MD)No.6538 of 2022 in C.R.P.(MD)SR.No.40109 of 2022 V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J. The present Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 44 days in filing the above Civil Revision Petition. 2.Heard Ms.S.Ananthi for the petitioner and Mr.S.Suresh Manikkam representing Mr.R.J.Karthick for the second respondent. Though served, there is no representation for the first respondent. 3.Mr.S.Suresh Manikkam representing Mr.R.J.Karthick has no objection for allowing this application. 4.Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is allowed and the delay is condoned. Registry is directed to number the Civil Revision Petition, if it is otherwise in order and print the name of Mr.R.J.Karthick for the second respondent in the cause list, when the revision is listed under the caption 'for admission'. 15.06.2026 _______________ Page 1 of 2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.P.(MD)No.6538 of 2022 V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J. mm C.M.P.(MD)No.6538 of 2022 in C.R.P.(MD)SR.No.40109 of 2022 15.06.2026 _______________ Page 2 of 2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Madras High Court

Saraswathi (Died) 1.sankaraappa Naicker v. Rajeswari

CMP(MD)/6538/2022

Decision date: 2026-06-15
Text availability: Full text
Judges: V. Lakshminarayanan

Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗

Connected provisions and cases

No further provision or case links are recorded.

Judgment text

C.M.P.(MD)No.6538 of 2022 C.M.P.(MD)No.6538 of 2022 in C.R.P.(MD)SR.No.40109 of 2022 V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J. The present Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 44 days in filing the above Civil Revision Petition. 2.Heard Ms.S.Ananthi for the petitioner and Mr.S.Suresh Manikkam representing Mr.R.J.Karthick for the second respondent. Though served, there is no representation for the first respondent. 3.Mr.S.Suresh Manikkam representing Mr.R.J.Karthick has no objection for allowing this application. 4.Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is allowed and the delay is condoned. Registry is directed to number the Civil Revision Petition, if it is otherwise in order and print the name of Mr.R.J.Karthick for the second respondent in the cause list, when the revision is listed under the caption 'for admission'. 15.06.2026 _______________ Page 1 of 2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.P.(MD)No.6538 of 2022 V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J. mm C.M.P.(MD)No.6538 of 2022 in C.R.P.(MD)SR.No.40109 of 2022 15.06.2026 _______________ Page 2 of 2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis