WP No. 20376 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP No. 20376 of 2026 and WMP.No.21875 of 2026 M/s S. M. Exports (33ATFPOM7745N2Z4) Rep by its proprietor V.S. Murugesan, No. 144A Arul Jothi Nagar, Palladam, Tiruppur 641 664. ..Petitioner Vs The Assistant Commissioner (ST) Palladam -1 Assessment Circle, Tiruppur III Zone, CT office, 05/147, First Floor, AEPC building, Tiruppur road, Avinashi 641 654. ..Respondent Prayer : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the impugned order on the file of the Respondent vide GSTIN 33ATFPM7745N2Z4/2019-20 dated 09.08.2024 and quash the same which was uploaded only in the GST Portal after Cancellation of the Registration of the Petitioner and further direct the Respondent to pass an assessment order afresh after providing opportunity of personal hearing. For Petitioner: Mr. J. Madhusuthanan __________ Page1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 20376 of 2026 For Respondent: Ms. Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran Government Counsel (Tax) ORDER An order dated 09.08.2024 is assailed in this writ petition on the ground of alleged breach of principles of natural justice. 2. Ms. Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of the respondent.

3. The period of limitation for filing an appeal has expired. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to pay 50% of the disputed tax demand as a condition for remand. An endorsement to that effect is made on the bundle. 4. Subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 50% of the disputed tax demand, as agreed to, within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded for re-consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within three months from the date of remittance of 50% of the disputed tax demand. __________ Page2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 20376 of 2026 5. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 12-06-2026 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No KJ To The Assistant Commissioner (ST) Palladam -1 Assessment Circle, Tiruppur III Zone, CT office, 05/147, First Floor, AEPC building, Tiruppur road, Avinashi 641 654. __________ Page3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 20376 of 2026 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. KJ WP No. 20376 of 2026 and WMP.No.21875 of 2026 12-06-2026 __________ Page4 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

WP No. 20376 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP No. 20376 of 2026 and WMP.No.21875 of 2026 M/s S. M. Exports (33ATFPOM7745N2Z4) Rep by its proprietor V.S. Murugesan, No. 144A Arul Jothi Nagar, Palladam, Tiruppur 641 664. ..Petitioner Vs The Assistant Commissioner (ST) Palladam -1 Assessment Circle, Tiruppur III Zone, CT office, 05/147, First Floor, AEPC building, Tiruppur road, Avinashi 641 654. ..Respondent Prayer : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the impugned order on the file of the Respondent vide GSTIN 33ATFPM7745N2Z4/2019-20 dated 09.08.2024 and quash the same which was uploaded only in the GST Portal after Cancellation of the Registration of the Petitioner and further direct the Respondent to pass an assessment order afresh after providing opportunity of personal hearing. For Petitioner: Mr. J. Madhusuthanan __________ Page1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 20376 of 2026 For Respondent: Ms. Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran Government Counsel (Tax) ORDER An order dated 09.08.2024 is assailed in this writ petition on the ground of alleged breach of principles of natural justice. 2. Ms. Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of the respondent.

3. The period of limitation for filing an appeal has expired. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to pay 50% of the disputed tax demand as a condition for remand. An endorsement to that effect is made on the bundle. 4. Subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 50% of the disputed tax demand, as agreed to, within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded for re-consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within three months from the date of remittance of 50% of the disputed tax demand. __________ Page2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 20376 of 2026 5. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 12-06-2026 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No KJ To The Assistant Commissioner (ST) Palladam -1 Assessment Circle, Tiruppur III Zone, CT office, 05/147, First Floor, AEPC building, Tiruppur road, Avinashi 641 654. __________ Page3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 20376 of 2026 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. KJ WP No. 20376 of 2026 and WMP.No.21875 of 2026 12-06-2026 __________ Page4 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis