CRL OP No. 14503 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 11-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL OP No. 14503 of 2026 1. Pandiyan S/o.Annamalai, No.68, Alapputhur Village, Chengam Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District. 2. Raja S/o.Mathuramuthu, Alapputhur Village, Chengam Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State rep.by, The Inspector of Police, Chengam Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District. Cr.No.1084/2018. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Act, 2023, to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of arrest in Cr.No.1084 of 2018 on the file of the respondent police station. For Petitioner(s): Mr. E.Sathiyaraj Elangovan For Respondent(s): MR.N. PALANIVEL, GOVT.ADVOCATE (CRL.SIDE) ORDER The petitioners apprehend arrest for the alleged offence under Sections __________ Page1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 14503 of 2026 1447, 147, 148, 294(b), 506(2) of IPC (Corresponding Section 329(3), 191(2), 191(3), 296(b), 325(3) of BNS and Section 3(1) of TN Public Property (Prevention of Damage & Loss) Act, 1992 in Crime No.1084 of 2018 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the District Collector allotted a house site to the defacto complainant and others and they were constructed the house in the said land and on the date of occurrence, accused entered into the house of the defacto complainant and damaged the house and abused in filthy language. Hence, the complaint. 3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that this is the second anticipatory bail petition. He further submitted that the earlier anticipatory bail application was dismissed on the ground that the investigation is pending and that there is no change in circumstances in the present application. 4. Considering the gravity of the offences and upon the ground that there is no change in circumstances, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail. 5. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 11-06-2026 DRL __________ Page2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 14503 of 2026 To 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Chengam, Tiruvannamalai District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Chengam Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District. 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. __________ Page3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 14503 of 2026 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. DRL CRL OP No. 14503 of 2026 11-06-2026 __________ Page4 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

CRL OP No. 14503 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 11-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL OP No. 14503 of 2026 1. Pandiyan S/o.Annamalai, No.68, Alapputhur Village, Chengam Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District. 2. Raja S/o.Mathuramuthu, Alapputhur Village, Chengam Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State rep.by, The Inspector of Police, Chengam Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District. Cr.No.1084/2018. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Act, 2023, to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of arrest in Cr.No.1084 of 2018 on the file of the respondent police station. For Petitioner(s): Mr. E.Sathiyaraj Elangovan For Respondent(s): MR.N. PALANIVEL, GOVT.ADVOCATE (CRL.SIDE) ORDER The petitioners apprehend arrest for the alleged offence under Sections __________ Page1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 14503 of 2026 1447, 147, 148, 294(b), 506(2) of IPC (Corresponding Section 329(3), 191(2), 191(3), 296(b), 325(3) of BNS and Section 3(1) of TN Public Property (Prevention of Damage & Loss) Act, 1992 in Crime No.1084 of 2018 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the District Collector allotted a house site to the defacto complainant and others and they were constructed the house in the said land and on the date of occurrence, accused entered into the house of the defacto complainant and damaged the house and abused in filthy language. Hence, the complaint. 3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that this is the second anticipatory bail petition. He further submitted that the earlier anticipatory bail application was dismissed on the ground that the investigation is pending and that there is no change in circumstances in the present application. 4. Considering the gravity of the offences and upon the ground that there is no change in circumstances, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail. 5. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 11-06-2026 DRL __________ Page2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 14503 of 2026 To 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Chengam, Tiruvannamalai District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Chengam Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District. 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. __________ Page3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 14503 of 2026 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. DRL CRL OP No. 14503 of 2026 11-06-2026 __________ Page4 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis