WP No. 19793 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP No. 19793 of 2026 and W.M.P.Nos.21111 & 21112 of 2026 Maheswari Traders Rep. by its Proprietor D.R. Ranjith GSTIN 33ERRPR6282K1ZW, 19/20, Ellai Thottam Road, Nehru Nagar-2, Peelamedu, Coimbatore ..Petitioner(s) Vs The Assistant Commissioner (ST), Peelamedu North circle commercial Tax building Coimbatore ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records in the impugned Order in GSTIN 33ERRPR6282K1ZW /2021-22 dated 15.05.2024 issued by the Respondent and quash the same as it is without jurisdiction and clear violation of statutory provisions. For Petitioner(s): Ms.L.Sweety for Mr.S Karunakar For Respondent(s): Mr.L.Gokulraj, Government Counsel (Tax) *********** __________ Page1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 19793 of 2026 ORDER An order dated 15.05.2024 is assailed on the ground that the petitioner did not have a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits. 2. Mr.L.Gokulraj, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. 3. On perusal of the impugned order, it is evident that such order was issued without hearing the petitioner. The writ petition has been filed after the period of limitation expired.

4. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to remit 50% of the disputed tax demand as a condition for remand. An endorsement to that effect has been made on the bundle. 5. Subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 50% of the disputed tax demand within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded for re-consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within three months from the date of remittance of 50% of the disputed tax demand. __________ Page2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 19793 of 2026 6. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 09-06-2026 (3/4) Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No RNA To The Assistant Commissioner (ST), Peelamedu North circle commercial Tax building Coimbatore __________ Page3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 19793 of 2026 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. RNA WP No. 19793 of 2026 and W.M.P.Nos.21111 & 21112 of 2026 09-06-2026 (3/4) __________ Page4 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

WP No. 19793 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP No. 19793 of 2026 and W.M.P.Nos.21111 & 21112 of 2026 Maheswari Traders Rep. by its Proprietor D.R. Ranjith GSTIN 33ERRPR6282K1ZW, 19/20, Ellai Thottam Road, Nehru Nagar-2, Peelamedu, Coimbatore ..Petitioner(s) Vs The Assistant Commissioner (ST), Peelamedu North circle commercial Tax building Coimbatore ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records in the impugned Order in GSTIN 33ERRPR6282K1ZW /2021-22 dated 15.05.2024 issued by the Respondent and quash the same as it is without jurisdiction and clear violation of statutory provisions. For Petitioner(s): Ms.L.Sweety for Mr.S Karunakar For Respondent(s): Mr.L.Gokulraj, Government Counsel (Tax) *********** __________ Page1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 19793 of 2026 ORDER An order dated 15.05.2024 is assailed on the ground that the petitioner did not have a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits. 2. Mr.L.Gokulraj, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. 3. On perusal of the impugned order, it is evident that such order was issued without hearing the petitioner. The writ petition has been filed after the period of limitation expired.

4. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to remit 50% of the disputed tax demand as a condition for remand. An endorsement to that effect has been made on the bundle. 5. Subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 50% of the disputed tax demand within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded for re-consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within three months from the date of remittance of 50% of the disputed tax demand. __________ Page2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 19793 of 2026 6. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 09-06-2026 (3/4) Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No RNA To The Assistant Commissioner (ST), Peelamedu North circle commercial Tax building Coimbatore __________ Page3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 19793 of 2026 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. RNA WP No. 19793 of 2026 and W.M.P.Nos.21111 & 21112 of 2026 09-06-2026 (3/4) __________ Page4 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis