Karnataka High Court
Sri. Vijaya Naika. L v. The State of Karnataka
2026:KHC:49525 · WP/17469/2023
- Decision date
- 2026-09-10
- Text availability
- Full text
- Judges
- V Srishananda
Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗
Connected provisions and cases
No further provision or case links are recorded.
Judgment text
- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:49525 WP No. 17469 of 2023 CNR: KAHC010407522023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA WRIT PETITION No.17469 OF 2023 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. VIJAYA NAIKA. L AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, S/O LALYA NAIKA, RESIDING AT NO.14, NEAR WATER TANK, L. AGRAHARA THANDA, NAGENAHALLI, CHIKMAGALURU-577 168. …PETITIONER (BY SRI MILASH ARROL NORONHA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SAKARAYAPATTANA PS, REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, Digitally HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, signed by R MANJUNATHA BANGALORE-560 001. Location: HIGH COURT 2. MR. LOKESH NAIKA OF SUB-TAHSILDAR,KARNATAKA SAKARAYAPATTANA, KADUR TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU-577 135. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT WAHEEDA.M.M, HIGH COURT GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR R1 AND R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R/W SECTION 482 CODE OF - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:49525 WP No. 17469 of 2023 CNR: KAHC010407522023 CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR DATED 21.07.23 IN CRIME NO.137/2023 OF SAKARAYAPATNA PS FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SEC 447, 427 OF IPC, 1860, SEC 192(A) OF KARNATAKA LAND REVENUE ACT, 1964 AND SEC 3(E) OF PREVENTION OF DAMAGE TO PUBLIC PROPERTY ACT, 1984 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed the memo for withdrawal which reads as under: “Petitioner has challenged the registration of FIR in Crime No.137/2023 of Sakarayapatna P.S. Petitioner intends to withdraw the above petition with liberty to re-approach this Court in the event the final report would go against the petitioner. It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to permit the petitioner to withdraw the above petition with liberty to reapproach this Hon’ble Court in the event of the final report going against petitioner, in the interest of justice.” 2. Placing the memo in record, petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE kcm List No.: 2 Sl No.: 3 CT:VR