- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:47814 RPFC No. 168 of 2022 CNR: KAHC010355272022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 168 OF 2022 BETWEEN: ROOMAN THAYYAB, S/O ZAHOOR AHAMED, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/O NEAR HABIBIYA SHADI MAHAL GADDEHALLA 7TH CROSS VISHWANATHA NAGAR HASSAN DISTRICT - 573201 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. GIRISH KUMAR B. M.,ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. SMT. ASMA BANU, W/O ROOMAN THYYAB Digitally signed D/O SAHEB JAN by AASEEFA AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, PARVEEN Location: HIGH 2. INNAYA THAYYAB COURT OF D/O ROOMAN THYYAB KARNATAKA AGED ABOUT 06 YEARS, 3. ROAHN THAYYAB S/O ROOMAN THYYAB AGED ABOUT 2 YEARS, RESPONDENT NO. 2 AND 3 ARE CHILDREN OF ROOMAN THAYYAB MINORS REPRESENTED BY THEIR NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER RESPONDENT NO 1, - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:47814 RPFC No. 168 of 2022 CNR: KAHC010355272022 ALL ARE RESIDENT OF, 61, LAKYA VILLAGE AND POST, CHIKKAMAGALURU TALUK AND DISTRICT - 577 101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. JAYAKIRTHI M. C., ADVOCATE FOR R1- (ABSENT); R2 AND R3 ARE MINORS REP. BY R1) THIS RPFC FILED U/S.19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 04.07.2022 PASSED IN Crl.MISC.NO.20/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, CHIKKAMAGALURU., PARTLY ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED U/S.125 OF Cr.P.C FOR MAINTENANCE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,

ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA ORAL ORDER On 24.08.2026 following order was passed: "Sri.Madhu M. representing Sri.Girish Kumar B.M. seeks time on the ground that the matter appears to have been settled between the parties. Seeks time to verify. Hence, list the matter on 02.09.2026 under the caption 'for reporting settlement'." On this day there is no representation on either side on call. Therefore, it is clear that the petitioner is not evincing interest in the revision petition either due to settlement or due - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:47814 RPFC No. 168 of 2022 CNR: KAHC010355272022 to any other cause whatsoever. Hence, this Court is of the view that, the proceedings in the revision petition are required to be closed due to non-prosecution. Hence, this revision petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (DR.CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE AP CT:TSM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 23

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:47814 RPFC No. 168 of 2022 CNR: KAHC010355272022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 168 OF 2022 BETWEEN: ROOMAN THAYYAB, S/O ZAHOOR AHAMED, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/O NEAR HABIBIYA SHADI MAHAL GADDEHALLA 7TH CROSS VISHWANATHA NAGAR HASSAN DISTRICT - 573201 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. GIRISH KUMAR B. M.,ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. SMT. ASMA BANU, W/O ROOMAN THYYAB Digitally signed D/O SAHEB JAN by AASEEFA AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, PARVEEN Location: HIGH 2. INNAYA THAYYAB COURT OF D/O ROOMAN THYYAB KARNATAKA AGED ABOUT 06 YEARS, 3. ROAHN THAYYAB S/O ROOMAN THYYAB AGED ABOUT 2 YEARS, RESPONDENT NO. 2 AND 3 ARE CHILDREN OF ROOMAN THAYYAB MINORS REPRESENTED BY THEIR NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER RESPONDENT NO 1, - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:47814 RPFC No. 168 of 2022 CNR: KAHC010355272022 ALL ARE RESIDENT OF, 61, LAKYA VILLAGE AND POST, CHIKKAMAGALURU TALUK AND DISTRICT - 577 101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. JAYAKIRTHI M. C., ADVOCATE FOR R1- (ABSENT); R2 AND R3 ARE MINORS REP. BY R1) THIS RPFC FILED U/S.19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 04.07.2022 PASSED IN Crl.MISC.NO.20/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, CHIKKAMAGALURU., PARTLY ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED U/S.125 OF Cr.P.C FOR MAINTENANCE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,

ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA ORAL ORDER On 24.08.2026 following order was passed: "Sri.Madhu M. representing Sri.Girish Kumar B.M. seeks time on the ground that the matter appears to have been settled between the parties. Seeks time to verify. Hence, list the matter on 02.09.2026 under the caption 'for reporting settlement'." On this day there is no representation on either side on call. Therefore, it is clear that the petitioner is not evincing interest in the revision petition either due to settlement or due - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:47814 RPFC No. 168 of 2022 CNR: KAHC010355272022 to any other cause whatsoever. Hence, this Court is of the view that, the proceedings in the revision petition are required to be closed due to non-prosecution. Hence, this revision petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (DR.CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE AP CT:TSM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 23