Karnataka High Court
Smt. N. Shanthamma v. T N Ramakrishnappa
2026:KHC:47051 · RSA/1734/2024
- Decision date
- 2026-08-31
- Text availability
- Full text
- Judges
- V Srishananda
Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗
Connected provisions and cases
No further provision or case links are recorded.
Judgment text
- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:47051 RSA No. 1734 of 2024 CNR: KAHC010714202024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1734 OF 2024 (PAR-) BETWEEN: SMT. N. SHANTHAMMA D/O LATE T.K. NARAYANAPPA W/O N. KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, RESIDING AT CHINTADAPI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, SIDDLAGHATTA TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT - 562 105 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. HANUMANTHARAYAPPA K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. T N RAMAKRISHNAPPA Digitally signed by S/O LATE T.K. NARAYANAPPA, ANNAPURNA G AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, Location: High Court of Karnataka 2. SMT. JAYAMMA D/O LATE T.N. NARAYANAPPA, W/O NARAYANASWAMY AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS 3. PAPANNA S/O LATE T K NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:47051 RSA No. 1734 of 2024 CNR: KAHC010714202024 4. RAMACHANDRA REDDY S/O LATE T.K. NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS 5. T.N. SRINIVASA S/O LATE T.K. NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDING AT THIPPENAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI CHIKKABALLAPUR TALUK AND DISTRICT - 562 101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. A.LOURDU MARIYAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 30.09.2024 PASSED IN RA NO.87/2023 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, CHIKKABALLAPURA,PARTLY ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE
DATED 13.04.2023 PASSED IN OS.NO.507/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE C/C II ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHIKKABALLAPURA. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:47051 RSA No. 1734 of 2024 CNR: KAHC010714202024 ORAL JUGDMENT Learned counsel for the appellant has not served the copy of the appeal memo on the learned counsel for the Caveator. Likewise, office objections are not complied. Hence, the appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE GH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11