Karnataka High Court
Sri Y M Manjunath v. Sri Divakar Reddy
2026:KHC:46744 · RSA/1532/2014
- Decision date
- 2026-08-27
- Text availability
- Full text
- Judges
- Ashok S. Kinagi
Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗
Connected provisions and cases
No further provision or case links are recorded.
Judgment text
- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:46744 RSA No. 1532 of 2014 CNR: KAHC010471892014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1532 OF 2014 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN: SRI Y M MANJUNATH AGED ABUOT 36 YEARS S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA, R/AT YELUVAHALLIL VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, INDORAHOSAHALLI, BANGARPET TALUK - 563114 …APPELLANT Digitally signed by (BY SMT/MISS. SUNANDA SARKAR, ADVOCATE FORSHILPABAI S Location: SRI. DILIP KUMAR L, ADVOCATE FOR HIGH COURT OF SRI. SANGAMESH R B, ADVOCATE) KARNATAKA AND: 1. SRI DIVAKAR REDDY AGED ABOUT 52 YRS, S/O M S RAGHURAMREDDY, R/AT 1750, VIJAYANAGAR, BANGARAPET TALUK - 562114 2. SMT. B N ANUPAMA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:46744 RSA No. 1532 of 2014 CNR: KAHC010471892014 W/O SR RAVIKUMAR R/AT No.2616/29 MARUTI LAYOUT K R MAIN ROAD BEHIND CORPORATION BANK VIVEKANANDANAGAR BANGARPET - 563 114. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT/MISS. M R SHALAMALA, ADVOCATE FOR C/R SRI. SURESH M, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 11.8.2014 PASSED IN R.A.NO.55/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE PRESIDING OFFICER, FAST TRACK COURT, KGF, PARTLY ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND PARTLY CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 17.10.2012 PASSED IN O.S.NO.29/2006 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, KGF. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING,
THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:46744 RSA No. 1532 of 2014 CNR: KAHC010471892014 ORAL JUDGMENT 1. Learned counsel for the appellant files a memo dated 27.08.2026 seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the instant appeal. She submits that liberty may be reserved to the appellant to approach the Survey Authorities under Section 137 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964. 2. Memo is placed on record. 3. The regular second appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 4. In view of the disposal of the appeal, pending interlocutory applications, if any, do not survive for consideration and are accordingly disposed of. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE RK List No.: 2 Sl No.: 5